Stem Cells: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly

AI-generated keywords: Cancer stem cells Network architecture Metastatic potential Therapeutic approach Diagnosing

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Stem cells are of great interest in cancer research due to their ability to self-renew and differentiate into multiple cell types.
  • Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are controlled by developmental networks that are similar to normal stem cells, but can exhibit distinct phenotypic differences and morphological effects.
  • Recent research suggests that the difference between CSCs and normal stem cells lies in the spatial-temporal locality of their activation in the genome and resulting expression in the body.
  • The metastatic potential of CSCs is based on non-network-based genetic changes that enable the evolution of gene-based phenotypic properties of the cell, allowing it to escape and travel to other parts of the body.
  • Stem cell network theory allows for precise prediction of stem cell behavioral dynamics and mathematical description of proliferation for both normal and cancerous stem cells.
  • Targeting higher-order stem cells first may be the best therapeutic approach, as spontaneous remission of so-called cured cancers will always be a danger if lower-order CSCs remain untreated.
  • Understanding how CSC networks differ from those of healthy stem cells may lead to new methods for diagnosing and treating not only CSC-related cancers but also cancers generally.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Eric Werner

arXiv: 1608.00930v1 - DOI (q-bio.TO)
8 pages, explains why cancer stem cell networks and normal stem cell networks are mostly equivalent but have very different effects

Abstract: Cancer stem cells are controlled by developmental networks that are often topologically indistinguishable from normal, healthy stem cells. The question is why cancer stem cells can be both phenotypically distinct and have morphological effects so different from normal stem cells. The difference between cancer stem cells and normal stem cells lies not in differences their network architecture, but rather in the spatial-temporal locality of their activation in the genome and the resulting expression in the body. The metastatic potential cancer stem cells is not based primarily on their network divergence from normal stem cells, but on non-network based genetic changes that enable the evolution of gene-based phenotypic properties of the cell that permit its escape and travel to other parts of the body. Stem cell network theory allows the precise prediction of stem cell behavioral dynamics and a mathematical description of stem cell proliferation for both normal and cancer stem cells. It indicates that the best therapeutic approach is to tackle the highest order stem cells first, otherwise spontaneous remission of so called cured cancers will always be a danger. Stem cell networks point to a pathway to new methods to diagnose and cure not only stem cell cancers but cancers generally.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 Aug. 2016

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1608.00930v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the field of cancer research, stem cells have become a topic of great interest due to their ability to self-renew and differentiate into multiple cell types. Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are controlled by developmental networks that are often topologically indistinguishable from normal, healthy stem cells. However, CSCs can exhibit phenotypic differences and morphological effects that are distinct from normal stem cells. The question arises as to why this is the case. Recent research suggests that the difference between CSCs and normal stem cells lies not in their network architecture but rather in the spatial-temporal locality of their activation in the genome and resulting expression in the body. The metastatic potential of CSCs is not primarily based on their network divergence from normal stem cells but on non-network-based genetic changes that enable the evolution of gene-based phenotypic properties of the cell, allowing it to escape and travel to other parts of the body. Stem cell network theory allows for precise prediction of stem cell behavioral dynamics and mathematical description of proliferation for both normal and cancerous stem cells. It has been suggested that targeting higher-order stem cells first may be the best therapeutic approach, as spontaneous remission of so-called cured cancers will always be a danger if lower-order CSCs remain untreated. Additionally, understanding how CSC networks differ from those of healthy stem cells may lead to new methods for diagnosing and treating not only CSC-related cancers but also cancers generally. Therefore, while CSCs share many similarities with healthy stem cells at a network level, they exhibit unique characteristics that make them an important target for future cancer therapies. By understanding these differences between CSCs and healthy stem cells at both a network level and a genetic level, researchers can develop more effective treatments for various types of cancer.
Created on 03 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.