Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1607.06819v1

The paper "Social Politics: Agenda Setting and Political Communication on Social Media" by Xinxin Yang, Bo-Chiuan Chen, Mrinmoy Maity, and Emilio Ferrara explores the role of social media in political communication with a focus on politicians. Previous studies have investigated how individuals use social media for political discussion and mobilization; however, this research focuses on the activities of politicians themselves. Using Twitter data and agenda-setting theory to analyze over 100,000 tweets produced by U.S. President Obama and the 50 U.S. State Governors, the authors uncover the main topics of attention and interest of these actors. The study identifies seven macro-topics of conversation and finds that Twitter is particularly appealing for American opposition politicians. It also highlights differences in communication styles between Republican and Democrat Governors but notes that both parties are similarly active on Twitter. By reconstructing networks of occurrences of Governors' hashtags and keywords related to political issues, the authors observe that Republicans form a tight core with a stronger shared agenda on many issues of discussion. This research sheds light on how politicians use social media to shape political discourse and influence public opinion.

• - The paper explores the role of social media in political communication with a focus on politicians.
• - Using Twitter data and agenda-setting theory, the authors analyze over 100,000 tweets produced by U.S. President Obama and the 50 U.S. State Governors.
• - The study identifies seven macro-topics of conversation and finds that Twitter is particularly appealing for American opposition politicians.
• - There are differences in communication styles between Republican and Democrat Governors but both parties are similarly active on Twitter.
• - Republicans form a tight core with a stronger shared agenda on many issues of discussion.
• - This research sheds light on how politicians use social media to shape political discourse and influence public opinion.

Summary: The paper talks about how politicians use social media like Twitter to talk about politics. They looked at tweets from the U.S. President and State Governors. They found that opposition politicians like using Twitter more than others. Republicans and Democrats have different ways of talking on Twitter, but both use it a lot. Republicans agree with each other more often than Democrats. Definitions: - Social media: websites and applications that allow people to create and share content or to participate in social networking. - Political communication: the use of media to convey messages or information related to government or politics. - Twitter: a social media platform where users can post short messages called "tweets". - Agenda-setting theory: a theory that suggests that the media has the power to influence what topics are important for public discussion. - Macro-topics: broad categories of conversation or discussion. - Opposition politicians: politicians who are not part of the ruling party or group. - Republican/Democrat Governors: leaders of states in the United States who belong to either the Republican or Democratic political party. - Shared agenda: when people agree on what issues are important and need attention. - Political discourse: discussions related to politics and government policies. - Public opinion: what most people think about a particular issue or topic.

Social Politics: Agenda Setting and Political Communication on Social Media

Social media has become an increasingly important platform for political communication. Politicians use it to engage with their constituents, shape public opinion, and influence the national conversation. In this article, we will explore a research paper by Xinxin Yang, Bo-Chiuan Chen, Mrinmoy Maity, and Emilio Ferrara that examines how politicians use social media to set agendas and communicate politically.

Background

Previous studies have investigated how individuals use social media for political discussion and mobilization; however, this research focuses on the activities of politicians themselves. Using Twitter data and agenda-setting theory to analyze over 100,000 tweets produced by U.S. President Obama and the 50 U.S. State Governors, the authors uncover the main topics of attention and interest of these actors.

Findings

The study identifies seven macro-topics of conversation: economy/jobs; health care; education/youth; immigration/border security; energy/environmental protection; foreign policy/national security; civil rights/social justice issues. It finds that Twitter is particularly appealing for American opposition politicians as they are more likely to tweet about controversial topics than incumbents in office who tend to focus on less contentious issues like economic growth or job creation. The authors also highlight differences in communication styles between Republican and Democrat Governors but note that both parties are similarly active on Twitter when it comes to discussing politics online. By reconstructing networks of occurrences of Governors' hashtags and keywords related to political issues, they observe that Republicans form a tight core with a stronger shared agenda on many issues of discussion compared to Democrats who have more diverse conversations across different topics due to their broader range of interests within each issue area (e.g., healthcare).

Conclusion

This research sheds light on how politicians use social media to shape political discourse and influence public opinion through agenda setting strategies such as focusing attention on certain topics while downplaying others or creating narratives around particular issues in order to gain support from voters or sway public opinion towards their desired outcomes during elections or other events where decisions need to be made collectively by citizens at large (e.g., referendums).