Reviving Threshold-Moving: a Simple Plug-in Bagging Ensemble for Binary and Multiclass Imbalanced Data

AI-generated keywords: Data Mining Class Imbalance Ensemble Learning Threshold-Moving Strategies Model Performance

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Dealing with class imbalance in data mining is a significant challenge that can hinder method effectiveness.
  • Creating ensembles of classifiers trained on resampled balanced data is a common approach to address class imbalance.
  • Resampling methods like bagged decision trees with random undersampling or synthetic minority oversampling are typically used, but they may introduce biases and require predefined performance measures.
  • An alternative strategy involves using a threshold-moving method to adjust the decision threshold after training to counteract imbalance and adapt to specific performance metrics.
  • Probability thresholding bagging (PT-bagging) is introduced as a versatile plug-in method that preserves natural class distribution, resulting in well-calibrated posterior probabilities.
  • PT-bagging has been extended to handle multiclass data and rigorously validated on binary and multiclass benchmark datasets.
  • The combination of ensemble techniques with threshold-moving approaches offers a promising solution for addressing class imbalance issues in data mining tasks.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Guillem Collell, Drazen Prelec, Kaustubh Patil

Abstract: Class imbalance presents a major hurdle in the application of data mining methods. A common practice to deal with it is to create ensembles of classifiers that learn from resampled balanced data. For example, bagged decision trees combined with random undersampling (RUS) or the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE). However, most of the resampling methods entail asymmetric changes to the examples of different classes, which in turn can introduce its own biases in the model. Furthermore, those methods require a performance measure to be specified a priori before learning. An alternative is to use a so-called threshold-moving method that a posteriori changes the decision threshold of a model to counteract the imbalance, thus has a potential to adapt to the performance measure of interest. Surprisingly, little attention has been paid to the potential of combining bagging ensemble with threshold-moving. In this paper, we present probability thresholding bagging (PT-bagging), a versatile plug-in method that fills this gap. Contrary to usual rebalancing practice, our method preserves the natural class distribution of the data resulting in well calibrated posterior probabilities. We also extend the proposed method to handle multiclass data. The method is validated on binary and multiclass benchmark data sets. We perform analyses that provide insights into the proposed method.

Submitted to arXiv on 28 Jun. 2016

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1606.08698v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the field of data mining, dealing with class imbalance is a significant challenge that can hinder the effectiveness of various methods. One common approach to address this issue is to create ensembles of classifiers that are trained on resampled balanced data. This typically involves techniques such as bagged decision trees in combination with random undersampling or synthetic minority oversampling. However, many resampling methods introduce asymmetric changes to the examples of different classes, potentially leading to biases in the resulting models. Additionally, these methods often require a predefined performance measure before the learning process begins. An alternative strategy is the use of a threshold-moving method, which adjusts the decision threshold of a model after training to counteract imbalance and adapt to specific performance metrics. Despite the potential benefits of combining ensemble techniques with threshold-moving approaches, this area has received limited attention in research. In response to this gap, Guillem Collell, Drazen Prelec, and Kaustubh Patil have introduced probability thresholding bagging (PT-bagging) as a versatile plug-in method. Unlike traditional rebalancing practices, PT-bagging preserves the natural class distribution of data, resulting in well-calibrated posterior probabilities. Furthermore, the proposed method has been extended to handle multiclass data and has been rigorously validated on both binary and multiclass benchmark datasets. Through detailed analyses and experiments, insights into the effectiveness and adaptability of PT-bagging have been gained. Overall, this innovative approach offers a promising solution for addressing class imbalance issues in data mining tasks by leveraging ensemble learning techniques alongside threshold-moving strategies. The work by Collell et al. sheds light on an underexplored area within the field and provides valuable contributions towards improving model performance in imbalanced datasets.
Created on 14 Feb. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.