Adaptive Thresholding Heuristic for KPI Anomaly Detection

AI-generated keywords: Anomaly Detection KPI Adaptive Thresholding Heuristic (ATH) Time Series Data False Positives

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper addresses the issue of anomaly detection in time series data, specifically focusing on Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in a business context.
  • Existing anomaly detection solutions are often limited to specific outlier detectors, which restricts their applicability to broader anomaly detection use cases.
  • The authors propose an Adaptive Thresholding Heuristic (ATH) that dynamically adjusts the detection threshold based on the local properties of the data distribution and adapts to changes in time series patterns.
  • ATH considers both the expected periodicity and observed proportion of anomalies to derive the threshold, effectively capturing meaningful anomalies while filtering out irrelevant outliers.
  • ATH can be used with any underlying seasonality decomposition method and an outlier detector that provides an outlier score.
  • Experimental results using EON1-Cell-U dataset demonstrate that ATH is computationally efficient and scalable for near real-time anomaly detection.
  • ATH is flexible when used with multiple forecasters and outlier detectors.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Ebenezer R. H. P. Isaac, Akshat Sharma

License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: A plethora of outlier detectors have been explored in the time series domain, however, in a business sense, not all outliers are anomalies of interest. Existing anomaly detection solutions are confined to certain outlier detectors limiting their applicability to broader anomaly detection use cases. Network KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) tend to exhibit stochastic behaviour producing statistical outliers, most of which do not adversely affect business operations. Thus, a heuristic is required to capture the business definition of an anomaly for time series KPI. This article proposes an Adaptive Thresholding Heuristic (ATH) to dynamically adjust the detection threshold based on the local properties of the data distribution and adapt to changes in time series patterns. The heuristic derives the threshold based on the expected periodicity and the observed proportion of anomalies minimizing false positives and addressing concept drift. ATH can be used in conjunction with any underlying seasonality decomposition method and an outlier detector that yields an outlier score. This method has been tested on EON1-Cell-U, a labeled KPI anomaly dataset produced by Ericsson, to validate our hypothesis. Experimental results show that ATH is computationally efficient making it scalable for near real time anomaly detection and flexible with multiple forecasters and outlier detectors.

Submitted to arXiv on 21 Aug. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2308.10504v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "Adaptive Thresholding Heuristic for KPI Anomaly Detection" addresses the issue of anomaly detection in time series data, specifically focusing on Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in a business context. While numerous outlier detectors have been developed for time series data, not all outliers are necessarily anomalies of interest from a business perspective. Existing anomaly detection solutions are often limited to specific outlier detectors, which restricts their applicability to broader anomaly detection use cases. In the case of network KPIs, these indicators tend to exhibit stochastic behavior, resulting in statistical outliers that do not significantly impact business operations. Therefore, there is a need for a heuristic approach that captures the business definition of an anomaly for time series KPIs. To address this challenge, the authors propose an Adaptive Thresholding Heuristic (ATH) that dynamically adjusts the detection threshold based on the local properties of the data distribution and adapts to changes in time series patterns. The ATH heuristic derives the threshold by considering both the expected periodicity and the observed proportion of anomalies. By minimizing false positives and addressing concept drift, this approach effectively captures meaningful anomalies while filtering out irrelevant outliers. Importantly, ATH can be used in conjunction with any underlying seasonality decomposition method and an outlier detector that provides an outlier score. To validate their hypothesis, the authors tested ATH on EON1-Cell-U, a labeled KPI anomaly dataset produced by Ericsson. The experimental results demonstrate that ATH is computationally efficient, making it scalable for near real-time anomaly detection. Additionally, it proves flexible when used with multiple forecasters and outlier detectors. Overall, this paper introduces an innovative approach to KPI anomaly detection by proposing the Adaptive Thresholding Heuristic (ATH). By dynamically adjusting the detection threshold based on local data properties and adapting to changes in time series patterns while minimizing false positives , ATH effectively captures meaningful anomalies . The experimental results validate its computational efficiency and scalability for real-time anomaly detection , making it a valuable tool in various business contexts .
Created on 24 Oct. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.