"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Machine learning models are often seen as black boxes, which hinders trust in their predictions.
- Understanding the reasons behind predictions is crucial for assessing trust in a model.
- LIME (Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations) is a novel explanation technique proposed by the authors.
- LIME provides interpretable and faithful explanations for predictions made by any classifier.
- LIME learns an interpretable model locally around each prediction to achieve this.
- The authors also introduce a method to explain models by presenting representative individual predictions and their explanations in a non-redundant manner.
- LIME's flexibility is demonstrated through its application to text and image classification models.
- The usefulness of explanations provided by LIME is validated through experiments conducted in simulated environments and with human subjects.
- Explanations empower users in various scenarios where trust is essential, such as deciding whether to trust a prediction, choosing between different models, improving an untrustworthy classifier, and identifying reasons why a classifier should not be trusted.
- Overall, LIME is presented as an effective solution for explaining machine learning model predictions in an interpretable and trustworthy manner.
Authors: Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, Carlos Guestrin
Abstract: Despite widespread adoption, machine learning models remain mostly black boxes. Understanding the reasons behind predictions is, however, quite important in assessing trust in a model. Trust is fundamental if one plans to take action based on a prediction, or when choosing whether or not to deploy a new model. Such understanding further provides insights into the model, which can be used to turn an untrustworthy model or prediction into a trustworthy one. In this work, we propose LIME, a novel explanation technique that explains the predictions of any classifier in an interpretable and faithful manner, by learning an interpretable model locally around the prediction. We further propose a method to explain models by presenting representative individual predictions and their explanations in a non-redundant way, framing the task as a submodular optimization problem. We demonstrate the flexibility of these methods by explaining different models for text (e.g. random forests) and image classification (e.g. neural networks). The usefulness of explanations is shown via novel experiments, both simulated and with human subjects. Our explanations empower users in various scenarios that require trust: deciding if one should trust a prediction, choosing between models, improving an untrustworthy classifier, and detecting why a classifier should not be trusted.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.