"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier

AI-generated keywords: LIME Trust Machine Learning Interpretable Predictions

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Machine learning models are often seen as black boxes, which hinders trust in their predictions.
  • Understanding the reasons behind predictions is crucial for assessing trust in a model.
  • LIME (Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations) is a novel explanation technique proposed by the authors.
  • LIME provides interpretable and faithful explanations for predictions made by any classifier.
  • LIME learns an interpretable model locally around each prediction to achieve this.
  • The authors also introduce a method to explain models by presenting representative individual predictions and their explanations in a non-redundant manner.
  • LIME's flexibility is demonstrated through its application to text and image classification models.
  • The usefulness of explanations provided by LIME is validated through experiments conducted in simulated environments and with human subjects.
  • Explanations empower users in various scenarios where trust is essential, such as deciding whether to trust a prediction, choosing between different models, improving an untrustworthy classifier, and identifying reasons why a classifier should not be trusted.
  • Overall, LIME is presented as an effective solution for explaining machine learning model predictions in an interpretable and trustworthy manner.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, Carlos Guestrin

Abstract: Despite widespread adoption, machine learning models remain mostly black boxes. Understanding the reasons behind predictions is, however, quite important in assessing trust in a model. Trust is fundamental if one plans to take action based on a prediction, or when choosing whether or not to deploy a new model. Such understanding further provides insights into the model, which can be used to turn an untrustworthy model or prediction into a trustworthy one. In this work, we propose LIME, a novel explanation technique that explains the predictions of any classifier in an interpretable and faithful manner, by learning an interpretable model locally around the prediction. We further propose a method to explain models by presenting representative individual predictions and their explanations in a non-redundant way, framing the task as a submodular optimization problem. We demonstrate the flexibility of these methods by explaining different models for text (e.g. random forests) and image classification (e.g. neural networks). The usefulness of explanations is shown via novel experiments, both simulated and with human subjects. Our explanations empower users in various scenarios that require trust: deciding if one should trust a prediction, choosing between models, improving an untrustworthy classifier, and detecting why a classifier should not be trusted.

Submitted to arXiv on 16 Feb. 2016

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1602.04938v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the paper titled "Why Should I Trust You? ": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier, authors Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Sameer Singh, and Carlos Guestrin address the issue of machine learning models being black boxes despite their widespread adoption. They emphasize the importance of understanding the reasons behind predictions in order to assess trust in a model. To tackle this problem, the authors propose LIME (Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations), a novel explanation technique that provides interpretable and faithful explanations for predictions made by any classifier. LIME achieves this by learning an interpretable model locally around each prediction. Additionally, the authors introduce a method to explain models by presenting representative individual predictions and their explanations in a non-redundant manner, framing it as a submodular optimization problem. The flexibility of LIME is demonstrated through its application to different models for text (such as random forests) and image classification (including neural networks). The usefulness of explanations is validated through novel experiments conducted both in simulated environments and with human subjects. The authors highlight that their explanations empower users in various scenarios where trust is essential. These scenarios include deciding whether to trust a prediction, choosing between different models, improving an untrustworthy classifier, and identifying reasons why a classifier should not be trusted. Overall, this paper presents LIME as an effective solution for explaining machine learning model predictions in an interpretable and trustworthy manner. By providing insights into the underlying reasons behind predictions, LIME enables users to make informed decisions based on these predictions and enhances trust in machine learning models.
Created on 01 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.