Collision between Neutron Stars and Asteroids as a Mechanism for Fast Radio Bursts
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are characterized by brief durations and high intensities, detected at approximately 1.4 GHz.
- FRBs may occur much more frequently than currently observed, potentially at a rate of around 10^3 to 10^4 per sky per day.
- The central hypothesis of the study is that FRBs could be generated by collisions between neutron stars and asteroids.
- This novel model explains the millisecond duration of FRBs and accounts for the energetics and event rate associated with these phenomena.
- Linking FRBs to neutron star-small body collision events provides a comprehensive framework that sheds light on these cosmic occurrences.
- The research was presented at the "Frontiers in Radio Astronomy and FAST Early Sciences Symposium 2015" conference held in Guiyang, China from July 29th to 31st, 2015.
- The study focuses on astro-ph.HE (high-energy astrophysical phenomena) and contributes valuable insights into the origins and mechanisms behind fast radio bursts.
Authors: Y. F. Huang, J. J. Geng
Abstract: As a new kind of radio transient sources detected at $\sim 1.4$ GHz, fast radio bursts are specially characterized by their short durations and high intensities. Although only ten events are detected so far, fast radio bursts may actually frequently happen at a rate of $\sim 10^{3}$ --- $10^4~\rm{sky}^{-1}~\rm{day}^{-1}$. We suggest that fast radio bursts can be produced by the collisions between neutron stars and asteroids. This model can naturally explain the millisecond duration of fast radio bursts. The energetics and event rate can also be safely accounted for. Fast radio bursts thus may be one side of the multifaces of the neutron star-small body collision events, which are previously expected to lead to X-ray/gamma-ray bursts or glitch/anti-glitches.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.