Robust Defibrillator Deployment Under Cardiac Arrest Location Uncertainty via Row-and-Column Generation
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Sudden cardiac arrest is a major public health concern
- Timely treatment is crucial for survival
- Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) increase chances of survival when placed in public locations accessible to bystanders before emergency medical responders arrive
- Predicting exact location of future cardiac arrests is impossible, making it necessary to strategically deploy AEDs in public spaces
- Timothy C. Y. Chan, Zuo-Jun Max Shen, and Auyon Siddiq propose a data-driven optimization model that accounts for uncertainty in future cardiac arrest locations
- Their approach involves discretizing a continuous service area into numerous scenarios where the probability of cardiac arrest at each location is uncertain
- They model uncertainty using a polyhedral set calibrated with historical cardiac arrest data and propose a row-and-column generation solution technique that exploits the structure of the uncertainty set
- Using real cardiac arrest data from Toronto, they conduct an extensive numerical study on AED deployment in public locations
- Their findings show that hedging against cardiac arrest location uncertainty can produce AED deployments that outperform intuitive sample average approximations by 9-15% and cut the performance gap with respect to an ex-post model by half
- Accounting for cardiac arrest location uncertainty can lead to improved accessibility of AEDs during emergencies and potentially better survival outcomes
Authors: Timothy C. Y. Chan, Zuo-Jun Max Shen, Auyon Siddiq
Abstract: Sudden cardiac arrest is a significant public health concern. Successful treatment of cardiac arrest is extremely time sensitive, and use of an automated external defibrillator (AED) where possible significantly increases the probability of survival. Placement of AEDs in public locations can improve survival by enabling bystanders to treat victims of cardiac arrest prior to the arrival of emergency medical responders. However, since the exact locations of future cardiac arrests cannot be known a priori, AEDs must be placed strategically in public locations to ensure their accessibility in the event of an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest emergency. In this paper, we propose a data-driven optimization model for deploying AEDs in public spaces while accounting for uncertainty in future cardiac arrest locations. Our approach involves discretizing a continuous service area into a large set of scenarios, where the probability of cardiac arrest at each location is itself uncertain. We model uncertainty in the spatial risk of cardiac arrest using a polyhedral uncertainty set that we calibrate using historical cardiac arrest data. We propose a solution technique based on row-and-column generation that exploits the structure of the uncertainty set, allowing the algorithm to scale gracefully with the total number of scenarios. Using real cardiac arrest data from the City of Toronto, we conduct an extensive numerical study on AED deployment public locations. We find that hedging against cardiac arrest location uncertainty can produce AED deployments that outperform a intuitive sample average approximation by 9 to 15%, and cuts the performance gap with respect to an ex-post model by half. Our findings suggest that accounting for cardiac arrest location uncertainty can lead to improved accessibility of AEDs during cardiac arrest emergencies and the potential for improved survival outcomes.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.