Inference based method for realignment of single trial neuronal responses

Authors: Tomislav Milekovic, Carsten Mehring

arXiv: 1506.04899v1 - DOI (q-bio.NC)

Abstract: Neuronal responses to sensory stimuli or neuronal responses related to behaviour are often extracted by averaging neuronal activity over large number of experimental trials. Such trial-averaging is carried out to reduce noise and to reduce the influence of other signals unrelated to the corresponding stimulus or behaviour. However, if the recorded neuronal responses are jittered in time with respect to the corresponding stimulus or behaviour, averaging over trials may distort the estimation of the underlying neuronal response. Here, we present an algorithm, named dTAV algorithm, for realigning the recorded neuronal activity to an arbitrary internal trigger. Using simulated data, we show that the dTAV algorithm can reduce the jitter of neuronal responses for signal to noise ratios of 0.2 or higher, i.e. in cases where the standard deviation of the noise is up to five times larger than the neuronal response amplitude. By removing the jitter and, therefore, enabling more accurate estimation of neuronal responses, the dTAV algorithm can improve analysis and interpretation of the responses and improve the accuracy of systems relaying on asynchronous detection of events from neuronal recordings.

Submitted to arXiv on 16 Jun. 2015

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1506.04899v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 10 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.