Higgs boson gluon-fusion production in N3LO QCD

AI-generated keywords: Higgs boson QCD N3LO cross-section scale variation

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper is titled "Higgs boson gluon-fusion production in N3LO QCD"
  • The authors present a detailed calculation of the hadronic cross-section for the production of a Higgs boson at hadron-colliders
  • The calculation is based on a method to perform a series expansion of the partonic cross-section around the threshold limit to an arbitrary order
  • The authors find that for renormalisation and factorisation scales equal to half the Higgs mass, the N3LO corrections are of the order of +2.2%
  • This reduces the uncertainty due to missing higher-order QCD corrections by a factor of three
  • The total scale variation at N3LO is 3%, which further reduces uncertainties associated with missing higher-order corrections
  • This study provides an important contribution to our understanding of Higgs boson production at hadron colliders
  • Advanced mathematical techniques can be used to improve predictions for particle physics experiments
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Charalampos Anastasiou, Claude Duhr, Falko Dulat, Franz Herzog, Bernhard Mistlberger

Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 212001 (2015)
5 pages, 3 figures

Abstract: We present the cross-section for the production of a Higgs boson at hadron-colliders at next-to- next-to-next-to-leading order (N3LO) in perturbative QCD. The calculation is based on a method to perform a series expansion of the partonic cross-section around the threshold limit to an arbitrary order. We perform this expansion to sufficiently high order to obtain the value of the hadronic cross at N3LO in the large top-mass limit. For renormalisation and factorisation scales equal to half the Higgs mass, the N3LO corrections are of the order of +2.2%. The total scale variation at N3LO is 3%, reducing the uncertainty due to missing higher order QCD corrections by a factor of three.

Submitted to arXiv on 20 Mar. 2015

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1503.06056v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Higgs boson gluon-fusion production in N3LO QCD," Charalampos Anastasiou, Claude Duhr, Falko Dulat, Franz Herzog, and Bernhard Mistlberger present a detailed calculation of the hadronic cross-section for the production of a Higgs boson at hadron-colliders. The authors base their calculation on a method to perform a series expansion of the partonic cross-section around the threshold limit to an arbitrary order. They perform this expansion to sufficiently high order to obtain the value of the hadronic cross at N3LO in the large top-mass limit. The authors find that for renormalisation and factorisation scales equal to half the Higgs mass, the N3LO corrections are of the order of +2.2%. This result is significant because it reduces the uncertainty due to missing higher-order QCD corrections by a factor of three. The total scale variation at N3LO is 3%, which further reduces uncertainties associated with missing higher-order corrections. Overall, this study provides an important contribution to our understanding of Higgs boson production at hadron colliders and demonstrates how advanced mathematical techniques can be used to improve our predictions for particle physics experiments.
Created on 09 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.