The Cannon: A data-driven approach to stellar label determination

AI-generated keywords: Stellar Labels The Cannon Spectroscopic Surveys Milky Way Data-driven Approach

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The study discusses challenges in determining consistent stellar parameters and abundances for hundreds of thousands of stars in the Milky Way using spectroscopic surveys.
  • The authors introduce a new data-driven approach called The Cannon, which learns from a subset of reference objects with known labels to determine stellar labels for the remaining survey stars.
  • The model is trained on only 542 stars in 19 clusters as reference objects, with Teff, log g and [Fe/H] as the labels, and then applied to the spectra of 56,000 stars from APOGEE DR10.
  • The Cannon performs well even at lower signal-to-noise levels and delivers comparably good labels even at one ninth the APOGEE observing time.
  • Beyond the reference labels, The Cannon makes no use of stellar models nor any line-list but needs a set of reference objects that span label-space.
  • The results show that The Cannon is very accurate, with its stellar labels comparing well to those provided by APOGEE pipeline (ASPCAP) labels in DR10, with rms differences that are basically identical to the stated ASPCAP uncertainties.
  • The authors discuss the limitations of The Cannon and its future potential to bring different spectroscopic surveys onto a consistent scale of stellar labels.
  • This approach could be extended to other astronomical applications such as galaxy classification or exoplanet characterization.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Melissa Ness, David W. Hogg, Hans-Walter Rix, Anna Y. Q. Ho, Gail Zasowski

ApJ 808 16 (2015)
arXiv: 1501.07604v2 - DOI (astro-ph.SR)
Published in ApJ

Abstract: New spectroscopic surveys offer the promise of consistent stellar parameters and abundances ('stellar labels') for hundreds of thousands of stars in the Milky Way: this poses a formidable spectral modeling challenge. In many cases, there is a sub-set of reference objects for which the stellar labels are known with high(er) fidelity. We take advantage of this with The Cannon, a new data-driven approach for determining stellar labels from spectroscopic data. The Cannon learns from the 'known' labels of reference stars how the continuum-normalized spectra depend on these labels by fitting a flexible model at each wavelength; then, The Cannon uses this model to derive labels for the remaining survey stars. We illustrate The Cannon by training the model on only 542 stars in 19 clusters as reference objects, with Teff, log g and [Fe/H] as the labels, and then applying it to the spectra of 56,000 stars from APOGEE DR10. The Cannon is very accurate. Its stellar labels compare well to the stars for which APOGEE pipeline (ASPCAP) labels are provided in DR10, with rms differences that are basically identical to the stated ASPCAP uncertainties. Beyond the reference labels, The Cannon makes no use of stellar models nor any line-list, but needs a set of reference objects that span label-space. The Cannon performs well at lower signal-to-noise, as it delivers comparably good labels even at one ninth the APOGEE observing time. We discuss the limitations of The Cannon and its future potential, particularly, to bring different spectroscopic surveys onto a consistent scale of stellar labels.

Submitted to arXiv on 29 Jan. 2015

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1501.07604v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The study discusses the challenges of determining consistent stellar parameters and abundances for hundreds of thousands of stars in the Milky Way using spectroscopic surveys. The authors introduce a new data-driven approach called The Cannon, which learns from a subset of reference objects with known labels to determine stellar labels for the remaining survey stars. The model is trained on only 542 stars in 19 clusters as reference objects, with Teff, log g and [Fe/H] as the labels, and then applied to the spectra of 56,000 stars from APOGEE DR10. The Cannon performs well even at lower signal-to-noise levels and delivers comparably good labels even at one ninth the APOGEE observing time. The study highlights that beyond the reference labels, The Cannon makes no use of stellar models nor any line-list but needs a set of reference objects that span label-space. The results show that The Cannon is very accurate, with its stellar labels comparing well to those provided by APOGEE pipeline (ASPCAP) labels in DR10, with rms differences that are basically identical to the stated ASPCAP uncertainties. The authors discuss the limitations of The Cannon and its future potential to bring different spectroscopic surveys onto a consistent scale of stellar labels. They suggest that this approach could be extended to other astronomical applications such as galaxy classification or exoplanet characterization. Overall, this study presents an innovative data-driven approach for determining stellar labels from spectroscopic data that has significant implications for understanding our galaxy's structure and evolution.
Created on 05 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.