Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1411.6201v1

Agile Software Development (ASD) methodology has gained widespread adoption in the industry and there is a need to understand the challenges faced by software engineering students in order to design effective training methods. Existing research has mostly focused on eXtreme Programming (XP) based ASD methodologies, but there is a lack of empirical studies on Scrum-based ASD programming which is the most popular agile methodology among industry practitioners. This paper presents empirical findings on task allocation decision-making, collaboration, and team morale in the Scrum ASD process which have not been well studied previously. The study draws its findings from a 12-week long project involving 125 undergraduate software engineering students from a renowned university working in 21 Scrum teams. Instead of relying on traditional survey or interview methods with their limitations in scale and level of detail, fine-grained data was obtained through logging students' activities in an online agile project management platform called HASE. Over 10,000 ASD activities were logged during the study. Contrary to existing preconceptions, the results suggest negative correlations between collaboration and both team performance and team morale. This finding challenges previous assumptions about the positive impact of collaboration on team outcomes. By providing insight into aspects of Scrum-based ASD programming that have not been extensively studied before this research contributes to a better understanding of how to effectively train software engineering students in using agile techniques.

• - Agile Software Development (ASD) methodology has gained widespread adoption in the industry
• - Need to understand challenges faced by software engineering students for effective training methods
• - Existing research mostly focused on eXtreme Programming (XP) based ASD methodologies
• - Lack of empirical studies on Scrum-based ASD programming, which is the most popular agile methodology among industry practitioners
• - Paper presents empirical findings on task allocation decision-making, collaboration, and team morale in Scrum ASD process
• - Study involved 125 undergraduate software engineering students from a renowned university working in 21 Scrum teams over a 12-week project
• - Fine-grained data obtained through logging students' activities in an online agile project management platform called HASE
• - Over 10,000 ASD activities logged during the study
• - Results suggest negative correlations between collaboration and both team performance and team morale, challenging previous assumptions about its positive impact on outcomes
• - Research contributes to a better understanding of how to effectively train software engineering students in using agile techniques

Agile Software Development (ASD) is a popular way of making software that many people use. Researchers wanted to find out how to teach students about it. They looked at a method called Scrum, which is the most popular way of doing agile software development. They studied 125 students from a famous university who worked in teams for 12 weeks. They used an online platform called HASE to track what the students did. The results showed that working together didn't always make the teams do better, which was surprising." Definitions- Agile Software Development (ASD): A popular way of making software. - Methodology: A specific way of doing something. - Empirical: Based on real evidence and observations. - Collaboration: Working together as a team. - Morale: How happy and motivated someone feels. - Scrum: A specific method of doing agile software development. - Undergraduate: A student who is studying for their first degree at university. - Logging: Keeping track of information or actions in a systematic way. - Online platform: A website or application where people can do things or share information.

Understanding the Challenges of Agile Software Development for Students

Agile software development (ASD) has become a popular methodology in the industry, and it is important to understand the challenges that students face when learning how to use it. A recent study conducted by researchers from a renowned university sought to gain insight into task allocation decision-making, collaboration, and team morale in Scrum-based ASD programming. This research provides valuable information about how best to train software engineering students in using agile techniques.

Background on Agile Software Development

The term “agile” was first used in 2001 as part of an initiative called the Agile Manifesto which proposed an alternative approach to traditional software development processes. The manifesto emphasizes customer satisfaction through rapid delivery of working software, collaboration between teams and stakeholders, and continuous improvement throughout the process. Since then, various agile methodologies have been developed such as eXtreme Programming (XP), Scrum, Kanban, Lean Development, Feature Driven Development (FDD), etc., each with its own set of principles and practices. Among these methods, Scrum-based ASD is currently one of the most popular among practitioners due to its focus on iterative sprints and self-organizing teams.

Research Methodology

In order to gain insight into task allocation decision-making, collaboration, and team morale during Scrum-based ASD programming among students at a renowned university over 12 weeks period involving 125 undergraduate software engineering students from 21 teams were studied using fine grained data obtained through logging activities in an online project management platform called HASE instead of relying on traditional survey or interview methods with their limitations in scale and level of detail . Over 10 000 ASD activities were logged during this study providing detailed insights into student's behavior while using agile techniques .

Findings

Contrary to existing preconceptions , results suggest negative correlations between collaboration and both team performance and team morale . This finding challenges previous assumptions about positive impact of collaboration on team outcomes . It suggests that more collaborative teams may not necessarily be better performing or have higher levels of morale than less collaborative ones . Additionally , findings also indicate that there are significant differences between individual tasks allocated within different types of sprints suggesting that certain types may be more suitable for certain tasks than others .

Conclusion

By providing insight into aspects of Scrum - based ASD programming that have not been extensively studied before this research contributes towards better understanding how effectively train software engineering students in using agile techniques . It highlights importance for further investigation regarding impacts different types sprints can have on task allocations decisions , collaborations , performance & morale within teams working under agile methodology so appropriate training can be provided accordingly .