Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1406.7061v2

In the digital world, malwares are a significant threat that is constantly evolving with high complexity. These malicious software programs can penetrate networks, steal confidential information from computers, bring down servers, and cripple infrastructures. To combat these threats and attacks from malwares, anti-malware software has been developed. However, the existing anti-malware software is mostly based on the assumption that the malware structure does not change appreciably. This assumption has been challenged by recent advancements in second-generation malwares that can create variants and pose a challenge to anti-malware developers. To address this challenge of detecting second-generation malwares with low false alarms, Ashu Sharma and S.K. Sahay have conducted a survey on malwares and its detection techniques. In their paper titled "Evolution and Detection of Polymorphic and Metamorphic Malwares: A Survey," they present an overview of polymorphic and metamorphic malwares - two types of second-generation malwares that are particularly challenging to detect. The authors discuss various techniques for detecting these types of malwares, including signature-based detection, behavior-based detection, heuristics-based detection, sandboxing techniques, machine learning-based detection methods, and hybrid approaches. They also highlight the limitations of each technique and suggest future research directions for improving malware detection accuracy while minimizing false positives. Overall, this survey provides valuable insights into the evolution of malwares and the challenges associated with detecting them. It highlights the need for more sophisticated anti-malware solutions that can keep up with the ever-evolving threat landscape in the digital world.

• - Malwares are a significant threat in the digital world that constantly evolves with high complexity
• - Malicious software programs can penetrate networks, steal confidential information, bring down servers, and cripple infrastructures
• - Anti-malware software has been developed to combat these threats and attacks from malwares
• - Existing anti-malware software is mostly based on the assumption that malware structure does not change appreciably, which has been challenged by recent advancements in second-generation malwares that can create variants
• - Ashu Sharma and S.K. Sahay conducted a survey on malwares and its detection techniques to address this challenge of detecting second-generation malwares with low false alarms
• - The authors present an overview of polymorphic and metamorphic malwares - two types of second-generation malwares that are particularly challenging to detect
• - Various techniques for detecting these types of malwares are discussed including signature-based detection, behavior-based detection, heuristics-based detection, sandboxing techniques, machine learning-based detection methods, and hybrid approaches
• - Limitations of each technique are highlighted and future research directions for improving malware detection accuracy while minimizing false positives are suggested
• - This survey provides valuable insights into the evolution of malwares and the challenges associated with detecting them
• - There is a need for more sophisticated anti-malware solutions that can keep up with the ever-evolving threat landscape in the digital world.

Malwares are bad programs that can harm computers and steal information. People have made anti-malware software to stop them. Some malwares can change their structure, making it harder for the anti-malware software to detect them. Ashu Sharma and S.K. Sahay did a study on how to detect these tricky malwares better. They talked about different ways to find malwares, but each way has its limits and needs more research to improve accuracy. We need better anti-malware solutions because malwares keep changing and getting smarter. Definitions- Malware: Bad software that can harm computers or steal information. - Anti-malware: Software designed to stop or remove malware from a computer. - Signature-based detection: A way of detecting malware by looking for specific patterns in the code. - Behavior-based detection: A way of detecting malware by analyzing how it behaves on a computer. - Heuristics-based detection: A way of detecting malware by using rules and algorithms to identify suspicious behavior. - Sandboxing techniques: A way of running programs in an isolated environment to prevent them from affecting other parts of the system. - Machine learning-based detection methods: A way of detecting malware by training a computer program to recognize patterns in data. - Hybrid approaches: Combining multiple techniques for better malware detection accuracy.

Overview of Malwares and Their Detection Techniques

In the digital world, malwares are a significant threat that is constantly evolving with high complexity. These malicious software programs can penetrate networks, steal confidential information from computers, bring down servers, and cripple infrastructures. To combat these threats and attacks from malwares, anti-malware software has been developed. However, the existing anti-malware software is mostly based on the assumption that the malware structure does not change appreciably. This assumption has been challenged by recent advancements in second-generation malwares that can create variants and pose a challenge to anti-malware developers. To address this challenge of detecting second-generation malwares with low false alarms, Ashu Sharma and S.K. Sahay have conducted a survey on malwares and its detection techniques in their paper titled "Evolution and Detection of Polymorphic and Metamorphic Malwares: A Survey." In this article we will discuss an overview of polymorphic and metamorphic malwares - two types of second-generation malwares that are particularly challenging to detect - as well as various techniques for detecting them including signature-based detection, behavior-based detection, heuristics-based detection, sandboxing techniques, machine learning-based detection methods, hybrid approaches etc., along with their limitations. We will also discuss future research directions for improving malware detection accuracy while minimizing false positives.

Polymorphic & Metamorphic Malware

Polymorphic malware is a type of malicious code which changes its binary form each time it replicates itself without changing its functionality or purpose; whereas metamorphic malware is capable of modifying itself even further than just changing its binary form – it can modify its code structure too without changing its purpose or functionality (i.e., it “morphes”). Both these types of second generation malware present unique challenges to traditional anti-malware solutions since they keep mutating themselves making them difficult to detect using signature based methods which rely on static signatures for identification purposes only once when they first enter into system/network environment .

Signature Based Detection

The most common technique used by traditional anti virus programs is Signature Based Detection (SBD). It works by comparing incoming files against known signatures stored in databases maintained by security vendors such as Symantec or McAfee etc.. If any file matches one or more signatures then it is flagged as malicious otherwise not considered dangerous . The main limitation associated with this method is that if new variant appears then there won't be any matching signature available in database thus allowing new variant to bypass security measures undetected .

Behavioral Based Detection

This approach relies on monitoring program's behavior rather than searching for specific patterns within files like SBD does . Behavioral based detectors look at how application interacts with other processes , network resources , registry entries etc.. If any suspicious activity detected then alarm raised otherwise nothing happens . This method provides better protection against unknown variants but still vulnerable to zero day exploits where attacker uses previously unseen attack vector before vendor able to update their database accordingly .

Heuristic Based Detection

Heuristic based detectors use set rules defined by experts which helps them identify potential threats even if no exact match found during scanning process . For example , if certain file contains instructions related to deleting system files then detector might flag it as suspicious regardless whether exact pattern exists in database or not . Heuristics provide additional layer of protection but still prone to false positives due lack precision associated with rule sets used here so care must taken while configuring such systems properly else legitimate applications may get blocked unnecessarily causing disruption service availability across organization's infrastructure .

Sandboxing Techniques

Sandboxing involves running suspect program inside isolated environment so any damage caused remains confined within virtual boundaries instead affecting entire system/network directly thereby providing additional layer defense against unknown threats posed via polymorphic /metamorphic variants .. Sandboxed applications monitored closely looking out for unusual behaviors like excessive memory usage , unexpected network connections attempts etc.. If anything suspicious observed then appropriate action taken immediately either blocking access completely or quarantining affected file(s) until further investigation carried out manually later on ..

Machine Learning Based Detection Methods

Machine learning algorithms used detect new variants quickly without relying upon preconfigured rule sets like heuristics do .. Algorithms trained using large datasets containing both benign & malicious samples so they learn recognize patterns associated different kinds viruses/worms over time thereby increasing accuracy rate significantly compared other methods discussed above .. Also ML models capable adapting quickly whenever new type threat emerges onto scene making them ideal choice organizations looking secure their systems efficiently cost effectively manner possible ..

Hybrid Approaches Hybrid approaches combine multiple technologies together order increase overall effectiveness while reducing chances false positives occurring same time .. For instance combination behavioral analysis along with machine learning algorithms could help identify potentially dangerous activities taking place inside network much faster than relying upon single technology alone thus providing extra layer defense against advanced persistent threats targeting enterprise environments nowadays ...

Limitations & Future Research Directions Despite all advantages offered through various techniques discussed above there still some drawbacks need addressed order improve accuracy rate further reduce number false alarms generated during scanning process ... For instance current ML models require huge amount labeled data training phase therefore unable cope up rapidly changing threat landscape especially when dealing polymorphism /metamorphism issues hence need develop better algorithms handle such scenarios gracefully .... Similarly heuristics suffer from lack precision due limited number rules configured initially therefore more sophisticated rule sets needed order achieve desired level performance expected modern day antivirus solutions .... Lastly sandboxes require considerable amount resources maintain isolation between host operating system guest environment hence cannot deployed everywhere easily especially resource constrained devices like mobile phones tablets etc... Therefore researchers should focus developing improved versions existing technologies order overcome aforementioned shortcomings make sure organizations protected latest forms cyberattacks coming way near future ....