Modelling time and vintage variability in retail credit portfolios: the decomposition approach

Authors: Jonathan J. Forster, Agus Sudjianto

arXiv: 1305.2815v1 - DOI (stat.AP)

Abstract: In this paper, we consider the problem of modelling historical data on retail credit portfolio performance, with a view to forecasting future performance, and facilitating strategic decision making. We consider a situation, common in practice, where accounts with common origination date (typically month) are aggregated into a single vintage for analysis, and the data for analysis consists of a time series of a univariate portfolio performance variable (for example, the proportion of defaulting accounts) for each vintage over successive time periods since origination. An invaluable management tool for understanding portfolio behaviour can be obtained by decomposing the data series nonparametrically into components of exogenous variability (E), maturity (time since origination; M) and vintage (V), referred to as an EMV model. For example, identification of a good macroeconomic model is the key to effective forecasting, particularly in applications such as stress testing, and identification of this can be facilitated by investigation of the macroeconomic component of an EMV decomposition. We show that care needs to be taken with such a decomposition, drawing parallels with the Age-Period-Cohort approach, common in demography, epidemiology and sociology. We develop a practical decomposition strategy, and illustrate our approach using data extracted from a credit card portfolio.

Submitted to arXiv on 13 May. 2013

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1305.2815v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 11 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.