A Large-Scale Study of Online Shopping Behavior

Authors: Soroosh Nalchigar, Ingmar Weber

Abstract: The continuous growth of electronic commerce has stimulated great interest in studying online consumer behavior. Given the significant growth in online shopping, better understanding of customers allows better marketing strategies to be designed. While studies of online shopping attitude are widespread in the literature, studies of browsing habits differences in relation to online shopping are scarce. This research performs a large scale study of the relationship between Internet browsing habits of users and their online shopping behavior. Towards this end, we analyze data of 88,637 users who have bought more in total half a milion products from the retailer sites Amazon and Walmart. Our results indicate that even coarse-grained Internet browsing behavior has predictive power in terms of what users will buy online. Furthermore, we discover both surprising (e.g., "expensive products do not come with more effort in terms of purchase") and expected (e.g., "the more loyal a user is to an online shop, the less effort they spend shopping") facts. Given the lack of large-scale studies linking online browsing and online shopping behavior, we believe that this work is of general interest to people working in related areas.

Submitted to arXiv on 24 Dec. 2012

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1212.5959v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 29 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.