On statistical indistinguishability of the complete and incomplete markets
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Nikolai Dokuchaev's paper investigates statistical evaluation of market completeness and incompleteness in continuous time diffusion stock market models.
- Market completeness and incompleteness are non-robust properties, meaning small random deviations of the coefficients can convert a complete model into an incomplete one or vice versa.
- For any incomplete market from a wide class of models, there exists a complete market model with arbitrarily close paths of the stock prices and the market parameters.
- Incomplete markets are indistinguishable from complete markets in terms of their statistical properties.
- These findings have significant implications for investors and financial analysts who rely on statistical analysis to make informed decisions about investment opportunities.
- Investors should be aware that small changes in economic conditions can drastically alter their assessment of an investment opportunity's risk profile.
Authors: Nikolai Dokuchaev
Abstract: The possibility of statistical evaluation of the market completeness and incompleteness is investigated for continuous time diffusion stock market models. It is known that the market completeness is not a robust property: small random deviations of the coefficients convert a complete market model into a incomplete one. The paper shows that market incompleteness is also non-robust: small deviations can convert an incomplete model into a complete one. More precisely, it is shown that, for any incomplete market from a wide class of models, there exists a complete market model with arbitrarily close paths of the stock prices and the market parameters. This leads to a counterintuitive conclusion that the incomplete markets are indistinguishable from the complete markets in the terms of the market statistics.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.