A simple microstructure return model explaining microstructure noise and Epps effects

AI-generated keywords: microstructure returns Epps effect ARFIMA process bid-ask bounce fat tail distribution

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Saichev and Sornette present a comprehensive model of financial returns that incorporates various factors such as the ARFIMA process, bid-ask bounce effect, fat tail distribution of returns, and non-Poissonian statistics of inter-trade intervals.
  • The authors use this model to explain important stylized facts observed in the statistics of microstructure returns, including short-ranged correlation of returns, long-ranged correlations of absolute returns, microstructure noise, and Epps effects.
  • Microstructure noise effect states that volatility is a decreasing function of the time scale used to estimate it. This paradoxical phenomenon is explained by the negative return correlations inherent in the definition of the bid-ask bounce component.
  • The Epps effect states that cross-correlations between asset returns are increasing functions of the time scale at which they are estimated. In cases where there is a genuine correlation between two assets' returns, this effect is attributed to an average statistical overlap of momentum defined over a finite time scale in the presence of a long memory process.
  • The authors' model allows them to explain both qualitatively and quantitatively important stylized facts observed in the statistics of microstructure returns.
  • Their work has implications for investors who seek to understand market dynamics better and make more informed investment decisions based on these insights.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: A. Saichev, D. Sornette

International Journal of Modern Physics C 25 (6),1450012 (36 pages) (2014)
arXiv: 1202.3915v1 - DOI (q-fin.TR)
31 pages + 19 figures

Abstract: We present a simple microstructure model of financial returns that combines (i) the well-known ARFIMA process applied to tick-by-tick returns, (ii) the bid-ask bounce effect, (iii) the fat tail structure of the distribution of returns and (iv) the non-Poissonian statistics of inter-trade intervals. This model allows us to explain both qualitatively and quantitatively important stylized facts observed in the statistics of microstructure returns, including the short-ranged correlation of returns, the long-ranged correlations of absolute returns, the microstructure noise and Epps effects. According to the microstructure noise effect, volatility is a decreasing function of the time scale used to estimate it. Paradoxically, the Epps effect states that cross correlations between asset returns are increasing functions of the time scale at which the returns are estimated. The microstructure noise is explained as the result of the negative return correlations inherent in the definition of the bid-ask bounce component (ii). In the presence of a genuine correlation between the returns of two assets, the Epps effect is due to an average statistical overlap of the momentum of the returns of the two assets defined over a finite time scale in the presence of the long memory process (i).

Submitted to arXiv on 17 Feb. 2012

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1202.3915v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "A simple microstructure return model explaining microstructure noise and Epps effects," A. Saichev and D. Sornette present a comprehensive model of financial returns that incorporates various factors such as the ARFIMA process, bid-ask bounce effect, fat tail distribution of returns, and non-Poissonian statistics of inter-trade intervals. The authors use this model to explain important stylized facts observed in the statistics of microstructure returns, including short-ranged correlation of returns, long-ranged correlations of absolute returns, microstructure noise, and Epps effects. The microstructure noise effect states that volatility is a decreasing function of the time scale used to estimate it. This paradoxical phenomenon is explained by the negative return correlations inherent in the definition of the bid-ask bounce component. On the other hand, the Epps effect states that cross-correlations between asset returns are increasing functions of the time scale at which they are estimated. In cases where there is a genuine correlation between two assets' returns, this effect is attributed to an average statistical overlap of momentum defined over a finite time scale in the presence of a long memory process. The authors' model allows them to explain both qualitatively and quantitatively important stylized facts observed in the statistics of microstructure returns. They show how their model can account for short-ranged correlation of returns, long-ranged correlations of absolute returns, microstructure noise and Epps effects. By combining these different factors into one comprehensive model, Saichev and Sornette provide valuable insights into how financial markets operate at a microscopic level. Their work has implications for investors who seek to understand market dynamics better and make more informed investment decisions based on these insights.
Created on 05 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.