Fence - An Efficient Parser with Ambiguity Support for Model-Driven Language Specification
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper proposes an efficient bottom-up parsing algorithm called Fence
- Fence supports lexical and syntactic ambiguity in model-based language specification
- Model-based language specification has various applications, including language processors implementation, domain-specific language design, model-driven software development, data integration, text mining, natural language processing and corpus-based induction of models
- Traditional grammar-driven approaches constrain language designers to specific kinds of grammars and require general parser generators capable of dealing with ambiguities
- Fence enables the use of model-based language specification in practice through its support for ambiguity resolution
- The authors provide a detailed explanation of the Fence algorithm's architecture
- Performance evaluation results demonstrate its efficiency compared to other parsing algorithms.
- This paper presents a valuable contribution to the field of natural language processing and computational linguistics by introducing a novel approach to handling ambiguity in model-based language specification.
Authors: Luis Quesada, Fernando Berzal, Francisco J. Cortijo
Abstract: Model-based language specification has applications in the implementation of language processors, the design of domain-specific languages, model-driven software development, data integration, text mining, natural language processing, and corpus-based induction of models. Model-based language specification decouples language design from language processing and, unlike traditional grammar-driven approaches, which constrain language designers to specific kinds of grammars, it needs general parser generators able to deal with ambiguities. In this paper, we propose Fence, an efficient bottom-up parsing algorithm with lexical and syntactic ambiguity support that enables the use of model-based language specification in practice.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.