Dual-task Coordination in Children and Adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

AI-generated keywords: Dual-task coordination ADHD Executive functioning Motor functioning Comorbidity

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The study investigated dual-task coordination in children and adolescents with ADHD and its subtypes.
  • Executive functioning deficits have been associated with ADHD, and the central executive's ability to coordinate two tasks simultaneously was examined using both computerized and paper-and-pencil methods.
  • The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of task difficulty on dual-task performance in ADHD compared to age and education-matched healthy controls, test if the paper-and-pencil version of the dual-task method gives similar results in ADHD and healthy controls, as well as examine whether deficits in general motor functioning or comorbidity factors define dual-task functioning in ADHD.
  • Children and adolescents with ADHD can perform dual-tasks similarly to healthy controls without significant differences across different subtypes of ADHD.
  • Increasing task difficulty did not disproportionately affect individuals with ADHD compared to age- and education-matched healthy controls.
  • The paper-and-pencil version of the dual task method provided similar results as a computerized version for both groups.
  • General motor functioning was associated with dual task performance levels in healthy controls but did not define dual task functioning in individuals with ADHD.
  • Comorbidity factors were not found to be defining factors for dual task functioning in either group.
  • Cognitive interventions targeting executive function may benefit individuals with ADHD regardless of subtype classification.
  • Bullet points:
  • Study investigated dual-task coordination in children/adolescents with ADHD
  • Examined central executive's ability to coordinate two tasks simultaneously using computerized/paper-and-pencil methods
  • Aimed to investigate effect of task difficulty on dual-task performance, test if paper-and-pencil version gives similar results, examine whether deficits in general motor functioning or comorbidity factors define dual-task functioning
  • Children/adolescents with ADHD can perform dual-tasks similarly to healthy controls without significant differences across different subtypes
  • Increasing task difficulty did not disproportionately affect individuals with ADHD compared to age-/education-matched healthy controls
  • Paper-and-pencil version of dual task method provided similar results as computerized version for both groups
  • General motor functioning associated with dual task performance levels in healthy controls but did not define dual task functioning in individuals with ADHD
  • Comorbidity factors were not found to be defining factors for dual task functioning in either group
  • Cognitive interventions targeting executive function may benefit individuals with ADHD regardless of subtype classification
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Ketevan Inasaridze, Vera Bzhalava

arXiv: 1101.1858v1 - DOI (q-bio.NC)
31 pages, 9 figures, 7 tables

Abstract: The deficit of executive functioning was found to be associated with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in general and its subtypes. One of the important functions of central executive is the ability simultaneously coordinate two tasks. The study aimed at defining the dual-task performance characteristics in healthy children and adolescents on the computerised and the paper and pencil dual-task methods; investigating the effect of task difficulty on dual-task performance in ADHD in comparison to age and years of education matched healthy controls; testing if the paper and pencil version of the dual-task method is giving the same results in ADHD and healthy controls; investigating whether the dual-task functioning in ADHD is defined by the deficits in the general motor functioning and comorbidity factors. The study investigated dual task functioning in 6-16 years old 91 typically developing controls and 91 children with ADHD. It was found that: (1) the dual-task coordination is available in children and adolescents with ADHD in general and in its subtypes and not significantly different from performance of age and years of education matched healthy controls; (2) Increase of the task difficulty in dual-task paradigm don't affect disproportionately children and adolescents with ADHD in comparison to age and years of education matched healthy controls; (3) The paper and pencil version of the dual-task method is giving the same results in ADHD and healthy controls as computerised version; (4) The dual-task functioning in ADHD in general and in its subtypes is not defined by the general motor functioning while in healthy controls dual task performance is associated with the general motor functioning level; (5) The dual-task functioning in ADHD in general and in its subtypes is not defined by the comorbidity factors.

Submitted to arXiv on 10 Jan. 2011

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1101.1858v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

This study investigated the dual-task coordination in children and adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and its subtypes. Executive functioning deficits have been associated with ADHD and the central executive's ability to coordinate two tasks simultaneously was examined using both computerized and paper-and-pencil methods in 91 typically developing controls and 91 children with ADHD aged between 6-16 years old. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of task difficulty on dual-task performance in ADHD compared to age and education-matched healthy controls, test if the paper-and-pencil version of the dual-task method gives similar results in ADHD and healthy controls, as well as examine whether deficits in general motor functioning or comorbidity factors define dual-task functioning in ADHD. The findings revealed that children and adolescents with ADHD can perform dual-tasks similarly to healthy controls without significant differences across different subtypes of ADHD. Moreover, increasing task difficulty did not disproportionately affect individuals with ADHD compared to age- and education matched healthy controls. Additionally, the paper-and pencil version of the dual task method provided similar results as a computerized version for both groups. However, while general motor functioning was associated with dual task performance levels in healthy controls, it did not define dual task functioning in individuals with ADHD. Furthermore, comorbidity factors were not found to be defining factors for dual task functioning in either group. Overall, this study provides evidence that children and adolescents with ADHD can perform simultaneous tasks similarly to their typically developing peers without significant differences across different subtypes of ADHD. These findings suggest that cognitive interventions targeting executive function may benefit individuals with ADHD regardless of subtype classification.
Created on 11 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.