Code Quality Evaluation Methodology Using The ISO/IEC 9126 Standard
AI-generated Key Points
- The paper presents a methodology for evaluating the quality of source code and its static behavior in a software system, using the ISO/IEC-9126 standard as a basis.
- The proposed approach employs elements automatically derived from source code, enhanced with expert knowledge in the form of quality characteristic rankings.
- The methodology is highly flexible, allowing for customization of metrics and source code attributes employed, as well as the specific ISO/IEC-9126 characteristics to be assessed.
- The approach can capture software quality trends and express expert perceptions concerning system quality in a quantitative and systematic manner.
- The methodology enables software engineers to evaluate both internal (source code) and external (user-perceived) quality factors in an integrated manner.
- It allows for easy customization based on project-specific requirements or preferences.
- It provides a clear framework for assessing software quality that can be easily communicated to stakeholders.
Authors: Yiannis Kanellopoulos (University of Manchester, U.K), Panos Antonellis (University Of Patras, Greece), Dimitris Antoniou (University Of Patras, Greece), Christos Makris (University Of Patras, Greece), Evangelos Theodoridis (University Of Patras, Greece), Christos Tjortjis (Univ. of Ioannina, Greece and), Nikos Tsirakis (University Of Patras, Greece)
Abstract: This work proposes a methodology for source code quality and static behaviour evaluation of a software system, based on the standard ISO/IEC-9126. It uses elements automatically derived from source code enhanced with expert knowledge in the form of quality characteristic rankings, allowing software engineers to assign weights to source code attributes. It is flexible in terms of the set of metrics and source code attributes employed, even in terms of the ISO/IEC-9126 characteristics to be assessed. We applied the methodology to two case studies, involving five open source and one proprietary system. Results demonstrated that the methodology can capture software quality trends and express expert perceptions concerning system quality in a quantitative and systematic manner.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.