The Gauss-Bonnet Theorem for the noncommutative two torus
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Alain Connes and Paula Tretkoff's paper focuses on non-commutative geometry and the Gauss-Bonnet theorem for the noncommutative two torus.
- They analyze the zeta function of the Laplacian on the non-commutative two torus, particularly its value at zero.
- The value at zero remains constant regardless of the chosen volume element (Weyl factor) provided by a non-unimodular state.
- Their groundbreaking finding establishes an analogue of the Gauss-Bonnet theorem for the noncommutative two torus, revealing insights into fundamental principles in non-commutative geometry.
- Through detailed calculations, they present a general formula involving modified logarithms of the modular operator of the state.
- This formula supports their invariant result with respect to the Weyl factor, aligning with classical results.
Authors: Alain Connes, Paula Tretkoff
Abstract: In this paper we show that the value at zero of the zeta function of the Laplacian on the non-commutative two torus, endowed with its canonical conformal structure, is independent of the choice of the volume element (Weyl factor) given by a (non-unimodular) state. We had obtained, in the late eighties, in an unpublished computation, a general formula for this value at zero involving modified logarithms of the modular operator of the state. We give here the detailed computation and prove that the result is independent of the Weyl factor as in the classical case, thus proving the analogue of the Gauss-Bonnet theorem for the noncommutative two torus.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.