## Particle Stirring in Turbulent Gas Disks: Including Orbital Oscillations

### AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

- Andrew N. Youdin and Yoram Lithwick's paper describes the diffusion and random velocities of solid particles in protoplanetary disks due to stochastic forcing by turbulent gas.
- The authors include the orbital dynamics of Keplerian disks, both in-plane epicycles and vertical oscillations, and obtain a new result for the diffusion of solids.
- They find that the Schmidt number (ratio of gas to particle diffusivity) is Sc = 1 + (Omega t_stop)^2, where Omega is the orbital frequency and t_stop is the particle stopping time.
- This differs from the standard result, Sc = 1 + t_stop/t_eddy (in terms of the eddy turnover time, t_eddy), which is shown to be incorrect.
- The authors predict that particles larger than approximately 10 cm in protoplanetary disks will suffer less radial diffusion and settle closer to the midplane.
- As a result, such a layer of boulders would be more prone to gravitational collapse.
- The authors' predictions of RMS speeds, vertical scale height, and diffusion coefficients will help interpret numerical simulations.
- The authors confirm previous results for the vertical stirring of particles (scale heights and random velocities) and add a correction for arbitrary ratios of eddy to orbital times.
- They also find that the particle layer becomes thinner for t_eddy > 1/Omega with the strength of turbulent diffusion held fixed.
- To obtain their results, Youdin and Lithwick use two analytic techniques—the Hinze-Tchen formalism and the Fokker-Planck equation with velocity diffusion—with identical results when the regimes of validity overlap.
- They include simple physical arguments for scaling their results.
- Overall, this study provides important insights into how turbulence affects solid particles in protoplanetary disks and how these particles may evolve over time.

**Authors:**
Andrew N. Youdin (CITA),
Yoram Lithwick (CITA)

**Abstract:** We describe the diffusion and random velocities of solid particles due to stochastic forcing by turbulent gas. We include the orbital dynamics of Keplerian disks, both in-plane epicycles and vertical oscillations. We obtain a new result for the diffusion of solids. The Schmidt number (ratio of gas to particle diffusivity) is Sc = 1 + (Omega t_stop)^2, in terms of the particle stopping time, t_stop, and the orbital frequency, Omega. The standard result, Sc = 1 + t_stop/t_eddy, in terms of the eddy turnover time, t_eddy, is shown to be incorrect. The main difference is that Sc rises quadratically, not linearly, with stopping time. Consequently, particles larger than ~ 10 cm in protoplanetary disks will suffer less radial diffusion and will settle closer to the midplane. Such a layer of boulders would be more prone to gravitational collapse. Our predictions of RMS speeds, vertical scale height and diffusion coefficients will help interpret numerical simulations. We confirm previous results for the vertical stirring of particles (scale heights and random velocities), and add a correction for arbitrary ratios of eddy to orbital times. The particle layer becomes thinner for t_eddy > 1/Omega, with the strength of turbulent diffusion held fixed. We use two analytic techniques -- the Hinze-Tchen formalism and the Fokker-Planck equation with velocity diffusion -- with identical results when the regimes of validity overlap. We include simple physical arguments for the scaling of our results.

### Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

**Why do we need votes?**

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

## Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation**Look for similar papers (in beta version)**

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

**Disclaimer:** The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.