Rechercher par
Affiner les résultats

Les années correspondent au dépôt arXiv ou à la date de publication. Les filtres de revue et d’ORCID utilisent les publications indexées.

    Revues à inclure

    Au moins une des revues sélectionnées.

    Revues à exclure

    Exclure chacune des revues sélectionnées.

    Effacer les filtres

    Certaines sources sont temporairement indisponibles. Les résultats peuvent être incomplets ; réessayez dans quelques instants.

    High-quality academic publishing is built on rigorous peer review [...]

    Clive Loughlin
    Alok Tiwari

    Urban systems are transforming as artificial intelligence (AI) evolves from automation to Agentic Urban AI (AI systems with autonomous goal-setting and decision-making capabilities), which independently define and pursue urban objectives. This shift necessitates reassessing governance, planning, and ethics. Using a …

    Lire le résumé scientifique complet

    Urban systems are transforming as artificial intelligence (AI) evolves from automation to Agentic Urban AI (AI systems with autonomous goal-setting and decision-making capabilities), which independently define and pursue urban objectives. This shift necessitates reassessing governance, planning, and ethics. Using a conceptual-methodological approach, this study integrates urban studies, AI ethics, and governance theory. Through a literature review and case studies of platforms like Alibaba’s City Brain and CityMind AI Agent, it identifies early agency indicators, such as strategic adaptation and goal re-prioritisation. A typology distinguishing automation, autonomy, and agency clarifies AI-driven urban decision-making. Three trajectories are proposed: fully autonomous Agentic AI, collaborative Hybrid Urban Agency, and constrained Non-Agentic AI to mitigate ethical risks. The findings highlight the need for participatory, transparent governance to ensure democratic accountability and social equity in cognitive urban ecosystems.