# Properties of Invariant Set Theory

**Authors:** J. R. Hance, S. Hossenfelder, T. N. Palmer  
**arXiv:** [2108.08144](https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.08144)  
**Date:** 2021-08-18  
**Summary page:** https://www.summarizepaper.com/fr/paper/2108.08144v2/

## Abstract

In a recent paper (arXiv:2107.04761), Sen critiques a superdeterministic model of quantum physics, Invariant Set Theory, proposed by one of the authors. He concludes that superdeterminism is `unlikely to solve the puzzle posed by the Bell correlations'. He also claims that the model is neither local nor $\psi$-epistemic. We here detail multiple inaccuracies with Sen's arguments - notably that the hidden-variable model of quantum physics he uses to critique Invariant Set Theory bares no relation to Invariant Set Theory - and use this opportunity to lay out the properties of Invariant Set Theory as clearly as possible.
