Self-Consistent JWST Census of Star Formation and AGN activity at z=5.5-13.5
Authors: Jordan C. J. D'Silva, Simon P. Driver, Claudia D. P. Lagos, Aaron S. G. Robotham, Nathan J. Adams, Christopher J. Conselice, Brenda Frye, Nimish P. Hathi, Thomas Harvey, Rafael Ortiz III, Massimo Ricotti, Clayton Robertson, Ross M. Silver, Stephen M. Wilkins, Christopher N. A. Willmer, Rogier A. Windhorst, Seth H. Cohen, Rolf A. Jansen, Jake Summers, Anton M. Koekemoer, Dan Coe, Norman A. Grogin, Madeline A. Marshall, Mario Nonino, Nor Pirzkal, Russell E. Ryan, Jr., Haojing Yan
Abstract: The cosmic star formation history (CSFH) and cosmic active galactic nuclei (AGN) luminosity history (CAGNH) are self consistently presented at $z = 5.5-13.5$. This is achieved by analyzing galaxies detected by the James Webb Space Telescope from $\approx 400 \, \mathrm{arcmin^{2}}$ fields from the PEARLS, CEERS, NGDEEP, JADES and PRIMER surveys. In particular, the combination of spectral energy distribution fitting codes, EAZY and ProSpect, are employed to estimate the photometric redshifts and astrophysical quantities of 3947 distant galaxies, from which we compute the stellar mass, star formation rate and AGN luminosity distribution functions in four redshift bins. Integrating the distribution functions, we find that the CAGNH tentatively rises by $\approx 2.2$ dex over $z = 5.5-13.5$ compared to $\approx 1.8$ dex for the CSFH, indicating that the growth of supermassive black holes (SMBHs) tends to outpace the assembly of stellar mass. We connect our results of the CSFH and CAGNH at $z=5.5-13.5$ to that from $z= 0-5$ to determine the summary of $\gtrsim 13$ Gyr of star formation and AGN activity, from the very onset of galaxy formation to the present day.
Explore the paper tree
Click on the tree nodes to be redirected to a given paper and access their summaries and virtual assistant
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.