The emergence of galactic thin and thick discs across cosmic history
Authors: Takafumi Tsukui, Emily Wisnioski, Joss Bland-Hawthorn, Ken Freeman
Abstract: Modern disc galaxies commonly have distinct thin and thick discs that are separable in some combination of their kinematics, radial structure, chemistry and/or age. The formation mechanisms of the two discs and the timing of their onset remain open questions. To address these questions, we select edge-on galaxies from flagship JWST programs and investigate their disc structures in rest-frame, near-infrared bands. For the first time, we identify thick and thin discs at cosmological distances, dating back over 10 Gyr, and investigate their decomposed structural properties. We classify galaxies into those requires two discs (thin and thick discs) and those well fitted by a single disc. Disc radial sizes and vertical heights correlate strongly with total galaxy mass and/or disc mass, independent of cosmic time. The structure of thick discs resemble discs found in single-disc galaxies, suggesting that galaxies form a thick disc first followed by thin disc formation. The transition from single to double discs occurred around 8 Gyr ago in high-mass galaxies ($10^{9.75} - 10^{11}M_\odot$), earlier than the transition which occurred 4 Gyr ago in low-mass galaxies ($10^{9.0} - 10^{9.75}M_\odot$), indicating sequential formation proceeds in a "downsizing" manner. Toomre $Q$-regulated disc formation explains the delayed thin disc formation in low-mass galaxies, leading to the observed anti-correlation between the thick-to-thin disc mass ratio and total galaxy mass. Despite the dominant sequential formation, observations suggest that thick discs may continue to build up mass alongside their thin-disc counterparts.
Explore the paper tree
Click on the tree nodes to be redirected to a given paper and access their summaries and virtual assistant
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.