Is GN-z11 powered by a super-Eddington massive black hole?
Authors: Maulik Bhatt, Simona Gallerani, Andrea Ferrara, Chiara Mazzucchelli, Valentina D'Odorico, Milena Valentini, Tommaso Zana, Emanuele Paolo Farina, Srija Chakraborty
Abstract: Observations of $z \sim 6$ quasars powered by super-massive black holes (SMBHs, $M_{\rm BH} \sim 10^{8-10}\, M_\odot$) challenge our current understanding of early black hole formation and evolution. The advent of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has enabled the study of massive black holes (MBHs, $M_{\rm BH}\sim 10^{6-7} \ \mathrm{M}_\odot$) up to $z\sim 11$, thus bridging the properties of $z\sim 6$ quasars to their ancestors. JWST spectroscopic observations of GN-z11, a well-known $z=10.6$ star forming galaxy, have been interpreted with the presence of a super-Eddington (Eddington ratio $\equiv \,\lambda_{\rm Edd}\sim 5.5$) accreting MBH. To test this hypothesis we use a zoom-in cosmological simulation of galaxy formation and BH co-evolution. We first test the simulation results against the observed probability distribution function (PDF) of $\lambda_{\rm Edd}$ found in $z\sim 6$ quasars. Then, we select in the simulation those BHs that satisfy the following criteria: (a) $10 < z < 11 $, (b) $M_{\rm BH} > 10^6 \ \mathrm{M}_\odot$. Finally we apply the Extreme Value Statistics to the PDF of $\lambda_{\rm Edd}$ resulting from the simulation and find that the probability of observing a $z\sim 10-11$ MBH, accreting with $\lambda_{\rm Edd} \sim 5.5$, in the volume surveyed by JWST, is very low ($<0.5\%$). We compare our predictions with those in the literature and further discuss the main limitations of our work. Our simulation cannot explain the JWST observations of GN-z11. This might be due to (i) missing physics in simulations, or (ii) uncertainties in the data analysis.
Explore the paper tree
Click on the tree nodes to be redirected to a given paper and access their summaries and virtual assistant
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.