RELIKE: Reionization Effective Likelihood from Planck 2018 Data

Authors: Chen Heinrich, Wayne Hu

Phys. Rev. D 104, 063505 (2021)
arXiv: 2104.13998v1 - DOI (astro-ph.CO)
15 pages, 14 figures

Abstract: We release RELIKE (Reionization Effective Likelihood), a fast and accurate effective likelihood code based on the latest Planck 2018 data that allows one constrain any model for reionization between $6 < z < 30$ using five constraints from the CMB reionization principal components (PC). We tested the code on two example models which showed excellent agreement with sampling the exact Planck likelihoods using either a simple Gaussian PC likelihood or its full kernel density estimate. This code enables a fast and consistent means for combining Planck constraints with other reionization data sets, such as kinetic Sunyaev-Zeldovich effects, line-intensity mapping, luminosity function, star formation history, quasar spectra, etc, where the redshift dependence of the ionization history is important. Since the PC technique tests any reionization history in the given range, we also derive model-independent constraints for the total Thomson optical depth $\tau_{\rm PC} = 0.0619^{+0.0056}_{-0.0068}$ and its $15\le z \le 30$ high redshift component $\tau_{\rm PC}(15, 30) < 0.020 $ (95\% C.L.). The upper limits on the high-redshift optical depth is a factor of $\sim3$ larger than those reported in the Planck 2018 cosmological parameter paper using the FlexKnot method and we validate our results with a direct analysis of a two-step model which permits this small high-$z$ component.

Submitted to arXiv on 28 Apr. 2021

Explore the paper tree

Click on the tree nodes to be redirected to a given paper and access their summaries and virtual assistant

Also access our AI generated Summaries, or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.