Quantum Communication Complexity (A Survey)

AI-generated keywords: Quantum Communication Complexity Gilles Brassard Holevo's theorem Entanglement Distributed Computational Tasks

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Quantum communication is explored as more efficient than classical communication in the survey paper "Quantum Communication Complexity" by Gilles Brassard.
  • Holevo's theorem sets a limit on the amount of classical information that can be transmitted through quantum bits, stating that no more than n bits of classical information can be conveyed using n quantum bits unless parties are entangled.
  • Entanglement allows for twice as many classical bits to be communicated in cases where it is present, but no more.
  • The paper discusses contradictions in distributed computational tasks and scenarios where quantum communication cannot be efficiently simulated using classical methods.
  • Achieving the effects of transmitting quantum bits classically would require an exponentially larger number of bits in extreme cases.
  • Entanglement has the potential to reduce the need for classical communication, making certain distributed tasks feasible if non-communicating parties share prior entanglement.
  • The unique capabilities of entanglement raise questions about accurately simulating them in terms of classical communication.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Gilles Brassard

16 pages, LaTeX, no figures. Survey paper

Abstract: Can quantum communication be more efficient than its classical counterpart? Holevo's theorem rules out the possibility of communicating more than n bits of classical information by the transmission of n quantum bits --- unless the two parties are entangled, in which case twice as many classical bits can be communicated but no more. In apparent contradiction, there are distributed computational tasks for which quantum communication cannot be simulated efficiently by classical means. In extreme cases, the effect of transmitting quantum bits cannot be achieved classically short of transmitting an exponentially larger number of bits. In a similar vein, can entanglement be used to save on classical communication? It is well known that entanglement on its own is useless for the transmission of information. Yet, there are distributed tasks that cannot be accomplished at all in a classical world when communication is not allowed, but that become possible if the non-communicating parties share prior entanglement. This leads to the question of how expensive it is, in terms of classical communication, to provide an exact simulation of the spooky power of entanglement.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 Jan. 2001

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: quant-ph/0101005v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the survey paper "Quantum Communication Complexity," authored by Gilles Brassard, the concept of quantum communication being more efficient than its classical counterpart is explored. The paper discusses Holevo's theorem, which sets a limit on the amount of classical information that can be transmitted through quantum bits. This theorem states that no more than n bits of classical information can be conveyed using n quantum bits unless the parties involved are entangled. In cases where entanglement is present, twice as many classical bits can be communicated, but no more. The paper also delves into apparent contradictions in distributed computational tasks and highlights scenarios where quantum communication cannot be efficiently simulated using classical methods. It points out that in extreme cases, achieving the effects of transmitting quantum bits classically would require an exponentially larger number of bits. Additionally, the discussion extends to the potential for entanglement to reduce the need for classical communication. While entanglement alone is ineffective for transmitting information, there are instances where distributed tasks that are impossible in a purely classical setting become feasible if non-communicating parties share prior entanglement. This raises questions about the cost of accurately simulating the unique capabilities of entanglement in terms of classical communication. Overall, "Quantum Communication Complexity" provides insights into the intricate relationship between quantum and classical communication methods and sheds light on how entanglement can play a crucial role in certain computational tasks that transcend traditional communication boundaries.
Created on 29 Jul. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.