Graph Evolution: Densification and Shrinking Diameters

AI-generated keywords: Graph Evolution Densification Shrinking Diameters Real Graphs Network Evolution

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study titled "Graph Evolution: Densification and Shrinking Diameters" by Jure Leskovec, Jon Kleinberg, and Christos Faloutsos
  • Focus on growth patterns in social, technological, and information networks
  • Most graphs densify over time as the number of edges increases super-linearly in relation to the number of nodes
  • Introduction of a new graph generator based on a "forest fire" spreading process
  • Graphs generated using this approach exhibit properties observed in prior studies
  • Sharp transition in the "forest fire" model between sparse graphs and densifying ones
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Jure Leskovec, Jon Kleinberg, Christos Faloutsos

ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (ACM TKDD), 1(1), 2007
arXiv: physics/0603229v3 - DOI (physics.soc-ph)

Abstract: How do real graphs evolve over time? What are ``normal'' growth patterns in social, technological, and information networks? Many studies have discovered patterns in static graphs, identifying properties in a single snapshot of a large network, or in a very small number of snapshots; these include heavy tails for in- and out-degree distributions, communities, small-world phenomena, and others. However, given the lack of information about network evolution over long periods, it has been hard to convert these findings into statements about trends over time. Here we study a wide range of real graphs, and we observe some surprising phenomena. First, most of these graphs densify over time, with the number of edges growing super-linearly in the number of nodes. Second, the average distance between nodes often shrinks over time, in contrast to the conventional wisdom that such distance parameters should increase slowly as a function of the number of nodes (like O(log n) or O(log(log n)). Existing graph generation models do not exhibit these types of behavior, even at a qualitative level. We provide a new graph generator, based on a ``forest fire'' spreading process, that has a simple, intuitive justification, requires very few parameters (like the ``flammability'' of nodes), and produces graphs exhibiting the full range of properties observed both in prior work and in the present study. We also notice that the ``forest fire'' model exhibits a sharp transition between sparse graphs and graphs that are densifying. Graphs with decreasing distance between the nodes are generated around this transition point.

Submitted to arXiv on 27 Mar. 2006

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: physics/0603229v3

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their study titled "Graph Evolution: Densification and Shrinking Diameters," authors Jure Leskovec, Jon Kleinberg, and Christos Faloutsos explore the evolution of real graphs over time. They focus on growth patterns in social, technological, and information networks to gain a better understanding of how these networks change over extended periods. Previous research has identified static graph properties such as heavy-tailed degree distributions and small-world phenomena. However, there is a lack of information on network evolution. Through an analysis of various real graphs, the authors make several intriguing observations. Firstly, they note that most graphs densify over time as the number of edges increases super-linearly in relation to the number of nodes. This finding challenges conventional wisdom as it suggests that average distances between nodes often decrease over time. This is contrary to expectations that such parameters should increase slowly with the number of nodes. Existing graph generation models do not adequately capture these evolving behaviors. To address this gap, the authors introduce a new graph generator based on a "forest fire" spreading process. This model offers a simple and intuitive explanation for network evolution by requiring minimal parameters like node flammability. Importantly, graphs generated using this approach exhibit a wide range of properties observed in prior studies and the current investigation. Furthermore, the authors highlight a sharp transition in the "forest fire" model between sparse graphs and densifying ones. They find that graphs with decreasing distances between nodes are generated around this transition point. Overall, this study sheds light on how real-world networks evolve over time and provides valuable insights into their changing structures and dynamics.
Created on 28 Sep. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.