Diagrammatic proof of the BCFW recursion relation for gluon amplitudes in QCD

AI-generated keywords: Diagrammatic Proof

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper presents a comprehensive proof of the Britto-Cachazo-Feng-Witten tree-level recursion relation for gluon amplitudes in QCD.
  • Establishes a direct equivalence between BCFW decompositions and Feynman diagrams in particle physics.
  • Demonstrates the equivalence explicitly within a convenient gauge, offering valuable insights into calculating gluon amplitudes.
  • Analysis of gauge invariance and leveraging Yang-Mills vertices structure to validate the BCFW construction method.
  • Advances understanding of gluon amplitudes in QCD and deepens appreciation for theoretical frameworks like BCFW decompositions and practical tools such as Feynman diagrams.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Petros D. Draggiotis, Ronald H. P. Kleiss, Achilleas Lazopoulos, Costas G. Papadopoulos

Eur.Phys.J.C46:741-750,2006
24 pages, 33 figures

Abstract: We present a proof of the Britto-Cachazo-Feng-Witten tree-level recursion relation for gluon amplitudes in QCD, based on a direct equivalence between BCFW decompositions and Feynman diagrams. We demonstrate that this equivalence can be made explicit when working in a convenient gauge. We exhibit that gauge invariance and the particular structure of Yang-Mills vertices guarantees the validity of the BCFW construction.

Submitted to arXiv on 25 Nov. 2005

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: hep-ph/0511288v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper "Diagrammatic Proof of the BCFW Recursion Relation for Gluon Amplitudes in QCD" by Petros D. Draggiotis, Ronald H. P. Kleiss, Achilleas Lazopoulos, and Costas G. Papadopoulos presents a comprehensive proof of the Britto-Cachazo-Feng-Witten tree-level recursion relation for gluon amplitudes in Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD). The study establishes a direct equivalence between BCFW decompositions and Feynman diagrams, shedding light on their intricate relationship in particle physics. By operating within a convenient gauge, the authors demonstrate that this equivalence can be explicitly elucidated, providing valuable insights into the underlying mechanisms at play in calculating gluon amplitudes. Through an analysis of gauge invariance and leveraging the specific structure of Yang-Mills vertices, they establish with certainty the validity and robustness of the BCFW construction method. This work not only advances our understanding of gluon amplitudes in QCD but also deepens our appreciation for theoretical frameworks like BCFW decompositions and practical tools such as Feynman diagrams. It serves as a testament to the authors' dedication to unraveling complex phenomena within quantum field theory and paves the way for further exploration and refinement of computational techniques in high-energy physics research.
Created on 22 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.