The Magnetic Phase Diagram and the Pressure and Field Dependence of the Fermi Surface in UGe$_2$

AI-generated keywords: UGe$_2$ Magnetic Phase Diagram Fermi Surface De Haas-van Alphen Effect Quasiparticle Mass

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: T. Terashima, T. Matsumoto, C. Terakura, S. Uji, N. Kimura, M. Endo, T. Komatsubara, H. Aoki, K. Maezawa

arXiv: cond-mat/0202366v1 - DOI (cond-mat.str-el)
to be published in Phys. Rev. B

Abstract: The ac susceptibility and de Haas-van Alphen (dHvA) effect in UGe$_2$ are measured at pressures {\it P} up to 17.7 kbar for the magnetic field {\it B} parallel to the {\it a} axis, which is the easy axis of magnetization. Two anomalies are observed at {\it B$_x$}({\it P}) and {\it B}$_m$({\it P}) ({\it B$_x$} $>$ {\it B}$_m$ at any {\it P}), and the {\it P}-{\it B} phase diagram is presented. The Fermi surface and quasiparticle mass are found to vary smoothly with pressure up to 17.7 kbar unless the phase boundary {\it B$_x$}({\it P}) is crossed. The observed dHvA frequencies may be grouped into three according to their pressure dependences, which are largely positive, nearly constant or negative. It is suggested that the quasiparticle mass moderately increases as the boundary {\it B$_x$}({\it P}) is approached. DHvA effect measurements are also performed across the boundary at 16.8 kbar.

Submitted to arXiv on 21 Feb. 2002

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: cond-mat/0202366v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their study, Terashima et al. investigate the magnetic phase diagram and pressure and field dependence of the Fermi surface in UGe$_2$. They measure the ac susceptibility and de Haas-van Alphen (dHvA) effect at pressures up to 17.7 kbar for the magnetic field parallel to the easy axis of magnetization, which is the {\it a} axis. The authors observe two anomalies at {\it B$_x$}({\it P}) and {\it B}$_m$({\it P}), with {\it B$_x$} being greater than {\it B}$_m$ at any given pressure. They present a phase diagram illustrating how pressure and magnetic field are related. The Fermi surface and quasiparticle mass are found to vary smoothly with pressure up to 17.7 kbar unless the phase boundary {\it B$_x$}({\it P}) is crossed. The observed dHvA frequencies can be divided into three categories based on their pressure dependences: largely positive, nearly constant, or negative. The authors suggest that as the boundary {\it B$_x$}({\it P}) is approached, there is a moderate increase in quasiparticle mass. To validate this hypothesis, they perform DHvA effect measurements across the boundary at 16.8 kbar. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into how magnetic fields and pressure affect UGe$_2$, giving insight into its electronic properties and behavior under different conditions.
Created on 16 Jun. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.