The Nasdaq crash of April 2000: Yet another example of log-periodicity in a speculative bubble ending in a crash

AI-generated keywords: Nasdaq crash log-periodicity speculative bubble New Economy market behavior

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors Anders Johansen and Didier Sornette analyze the Nasdaq crash of April 2000, comparing it to the 1929 crash.
  • Both bubbles were driven by a belief in a "New Economy" leading to inflated share prices.
  • Nasdaq Composite dropped over 35% from its peak on March 10, 2000.
  • Largest drawdowns in Nasdaq are outliers with confidence level exceeding 99%, indicating extreme market events.
  • The study uses a quantitative framework to demonstrate alignment with research findings.
  • Significant statistical tests establish outlier nature of major market events and provide an objective definition of a crash.
  • Insights from the analysis shed light on speculative bubble patterns and dynamics, offering understanding of market behavior and risks associated with unsustainable growth.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Anders Johansen (UCLA), Didier Sornette (UCLA, Univ. of Nice and CNRS)

European Physical Journal B 17, 319-328 (2000).
arXiv: cond-mat/0004263v4 - DOI (cond-mat.stat-mech)
15 pages including 7 figures. Accepted in Eur. Phys. J. The revised version contains significant parametric and non-parametric statistical tests which establishes the outlier nature of the largest market events and provides an objective definition of a crash

Abstract: The Nasdaq Composite fell another $\approx 10 %$ on Friday the 14'th of April 2000 signaling the end of a remarkable speculative high-tech bubble starting in spring 1997. The closing of the Nasdaq Composite at 3321 corresponds to a total loss of over 35% since its all-time high of 5133 on the 10'th of March 2000. Similarities to the speculative bubble preceding the infamous crash of October 1929 are quite striking: the belief in what was coined a ``New Economy'' both in 1929 and presently made share-prices of companies with three digits price-earning ratios soar. Furthermore, we show that the largest draw downs of the Nasdaq are outliers with a confidence level better than 99% and that these two speculative bubbles, as well as others, both nicely fit into the quantitative framework proposed by the authors in a series of recent papers.

Submitted to arXiv on 17 Apr. 2000

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: cond-mat/0004263v4

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "The Nasdaq crash of April 2000: Yet another example of log-periodicity in a speculative bubble ending in a crash," authors Anders Johansen and Didier Sornette analyze the events leading up to the significant drop in the Nasdaq Composite on April 14, 2000. The authors highlight the parallels between this high-tech bubble and the speculative bubble that preceded the infamous crash of October 1929. Both instances were characterized by a fervent belief in a "New Economy" that led to soaring share prices for companies with inflated price-earning ratios. The closing of the Nasdaq Composite at 3321 marked a total loss of over 35% since its peak at 5133 on March 10, 2000. The authors point out that the largest drawdowns in the Nasdaq are outliers with a confidence level exceeding 99%, indicating the extreme nature of these market events. By applying a quantitative framework proposed in their previous work, Johansen and Sornette demonstrate how these speculative bubbles align with their research findings. Their study, published in the European Physical Journal B, includes significant parametric and non-parametric statistical tests that establish the outlier nature of major market events and provide an objective definition of a crash. Through their analysis, Johansen and Sornette shed light on the patterns and dynamics underlying speculative bubbles, offering valuable insights for understanding market behavior and potential risks associated with unsustainable growth.
Created on 29 Aug. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.