An excess of damped Lyman alpha galaxies near QSOs
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Sample of 33 damped Lyman alpha systems (DLAs) discovered in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS)
- DLAs have absorption redshifts (z_abs) within 6000 km/s of the systemic redshift (z_sys) of associated quasars (QSOs)
- Based on a sample of 731 non-broad-absorption-line (non-BAL) QSOs with redshifts between 2.5 and 4.5 from SDSS Data Release 3
- Search estimated to be approximately 100% complete for absorbers with column densities of neutral hydrogen (N(HI)) greater than or equal to 2e20 cm^-2
- Derived number density of DLAs per unit redshift, denoted as n(z), within velocity separations less than 6000 km/s is significantly higher compared to intervening absorbers observed in SDSS DR3 data set - almost by a factor of two
- Overdensity of galaxies near QSOs suggests physical motivation for excluding DLAs at small velocity separations in surveys targeting intervening "field" DLAs
- Overdensity is independent of the radio-loudness of the QSOs, indicating similar environments surrounding both radio-loud and radio-quiet QSOs
- Study highlights an excess population of damped Lyman alpha galaxies near quasars and emphasizes the importance of considering proximity effects when studying intervening absorbers in cosmological surveys
- Results contribute to understanding galaxy formation and evolution in relation to quasar environments
Authors: David M. Russell (Isaac Newton Group), Sara L. Ellison (University of Victoria), Chris R. Benn (Isaac Newton Group)
Abstract: We present a sample of 33 damped Lyman alpha systems (DLAs) discovered in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) whose absorption redshifts (z_abs) are within 6000 km/s of the QSO's systemic redshift (z_sys). Our sample is based on 731 2.5 < z_sys < 4.5 non-broad-absorption-line (non-BAL) QSOs from Data Release 3 (DR3) of the SDSS. We estimate that our search is ~100 % complete for absorbers with N(HI) >= 2e20 cm^-2. The derived number density of DLAs per unit redshift, n(z), within v < 6000 km/s is higher (3.5 sigma significance) by almost a factor of 2 than that of intervening absorbers observed in the SDSS DR3, i.e. there is evidence for an overdensity of galaxies near the QSOs. This provides a physical motivation for excluding DLAs at small velocity separations in surveys of intervening 'field' DLAs. In addition, we find that the overdensity of proximate DLAs is independent of the radio-loudness of the QSO, consistent with the environments of radio-loud and radio-quiet QSOs being similar.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.