Do Prediction Markets Forecast Cryptocurrency Volatility? Evidence from Kalshi Macro Contracts

AI-generated keywords: Prediction Markets Cryptocurrency Volatility Kalshi Macro Contracts Monetary Policy Channel Inflation Channel

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study by Hardhik Mohanty and Bhaskar Krishnamachari on using Kalshi macro prediction markets to forecast cryptocurrency volatility
  • Two distinct channels identified for forecasting: monetary policy channel and inflation channel
  • Monetary policy channel accurately predicts Bitcoin volatility based on Fed rate repricing with t-value of 3.63 and p-value < 0.001, but exhibits regime dependence related to rate-cutting cycle
  • Recession risk signal from KXRECSSNBER provides stable out-of-sample predictions for altcoins like Ethereum, Solana, Cardano, and Chainlink
  • Inflation channel successfully predicts altcoin volatility for Ethereum and Solana based on CPI repricing with t-statistics ranging from -2.1 to -3.4
  • Bitcoin--Fed-dovish and Chainlink--CPI specifications survive Benjamini-Hochberg correction at q = 0.05, showing robustness in predicting cryptocurrency volatility through these channels
  • Orthogonalization techniques used to confirm unique information carried by signals not captured by traditional market indicators
  • Study covers ten Kalshi event series and six cryptocurrency assets from January 2023 to March 2026, offering valuable insights into utilizing prediction markets for accurate cryptocurrency volatility forecasts
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Hardhik Mohanty, Bhaskar Krishnamachari

arXiv: 2604.01431v1 - DOI (q-fin.ST)
14 pages, 4 figures, 6 tables

Abstract: Daily probability changes in Kalshi macro prediction markets forecast cryptocurrency realized volatility through two distinct channels. The monetary policy channel, measured by Fed rate repricing on KXFED contracts, predicts Bitcoin volatility in sample with t = 3.63 and p < 0.001 but exhibits regime dependence tied to the 2024-2025 rate-cutting cycle. The recession risk signal from KXRECSSNBER proves more stable out of sample, delivering an MSFE ratio of 0.979 with Clark-West p = 0.020. The inflation channel, measured by CPI repricing on KXCPI contracts, predicts altcoin volatility for Ethereum, Solana, Cardano, and Chainlink with t-statistics ranging from -2.1 to -3.4 and out-of-sample gains for Ethereum at MSFE = 0.959 with p = 0.010 and Solana at p = 0.048. Both the Bitcoin--Fed-dovish and Chainlink--CPI specifications survive Benjamini-Hochberg correction at q = 0.05. Orthogonalization and baseline comparisons against Fed Funds futures, Treasury yields, and the Deribit implied volatility index confirm that these signals carry information not embedded in conventional financial instruments. The sample covers ten Kalshi event series and six cryptocurrency assets over January 2023 to March 2026.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 Apr. 2026

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2604.01431v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their study titled "Do Prediction Markets Forecast Cryptocurrency Volatility? Evidence from Kalshi Macro Contracts," authors Hardhik Mohanty and Bhaskar Krishnamachari explore the daily probability changes in Kalshi macro prediction markets to forecast cryptocurrency realized volatility. The research identifies two distinct channels through which this forecasting occurs. The first channel, known as the monetary policy channel, is measured by Fed rate repricing on KXFED contracts. This channel accurately predicts Bitcoin volatility within the sample with a t-value of 3.63 and p-value less than 0.001. However, it also exhibits regime dependence linked to the 2024-2025 rate-cutting cycle. On the other hand, the recession risk signal from KXRECSSNBER proves to be more stable out of sample, delivering an MSFE ratio of 0.979 with a Clark-West p-value of 0.020. The second channel identified in the study is the inflation channel, measured by CPI repricing on KXCPI contracts. This channel successfully predicts altcoin volatility for Ethereum, Solana, Cardano, and Chainlink with t-statistics ranging from -2.1 to -3.4. Out-of-sample gains are observed for Ethereum at MSFE = 0.959 with a p-value of 0.010 and for Solana at a p-value of 0.048. Both the Bitcoin--Fed-dovish and Chainlink--CPI specifications survive Benjamini-Hochberg correction at q = 0.05, indicating their robustness in predicting cryptocurrency volatility through these channels. Furthermore, orthogonalization techniques and baseline comparisons against conventional financial instruments such as Fed Funds futures, Treasury yields, and the Deribit implied volatility index confirm that these signals carry unique information not captured by traditional market indicators. The study covers ten Kalshi event series and six cryptocurrency assets over the period from January 2023 to March 2026, providing valuable insights into how prediction markets can be utilized to forecast cryptocurrency volatility with accuracy and reliability.
Created on 04 Apr. 2026

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.