Unveiling the Sources of X-ray Luminosity in DESI Galaxy Groups: Insights from the SRG/eROSITA All-Sky Survey

AI-generated keywords: eROSITA

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study utilizes data from the eROSITA all-sky survey to analyze X-ray luminosity of galaxy groups with varying halo masses at different redshifts
  • Identifies contributions of active galactic nuclei (AGN) and extended gas to X-ray emission in galaxy groups
  • Central AGN dominate X-ray emission in groups with lower halo masses, while extended gas plays a significant role in groups with higher halo masses
  • Uncertainties arise when AGN play a major role in X-ray emission, affecting the contribution from extended gas
  • Correlation observed between X-ray luminosity of central AGN and extended gas, but weakened by positional offsets
  • Results provide insights into feedback processes during group assembly history and highlight complex interplay between AGN activity and extended gas shaping X-ray properties of galaxy groups
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: YunLiang Zheng, Xiaohu Yang, Teng Liu, Shijiang Chen, Esra Bulbul, Ang Liu, Yi Zhang, Dawei Li, Xi Kang, Yizhou Gu, Yirong Wang, Qingyang Li, Jiaqi Wang

arXiv: 2511.14216v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
29 pages, 14 figures, ApJ accepted
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: We use the first eROSITA all-sky survey (eRASS1) to investigate the contributions of AGN and extended gas to the total X-ray luminosity ($L_X$) of galaxy groups with different halo masses ($M_h$) at different redshifts. The presence of AGN in their central galaxies is identified using multi-wavelength catalogs, including the X-ray counterparts, the ASKAP radio catalog, and the DESI spectroscopic measurements. We apply the stacking method to obtain sufficient statistics for the X-ray surface brightness profile and the $L_X$ for groups with different central AGN properties. We find that the X-ray groups exhibit the highest $L_X$, followed by groups with QSO, radio, BPT-AGN, and non-AGN centrals. Moreover, the $L_X$ of the $M_h \lesssim 10^{13}h^{-1}M_\odot$ groups is dominated by the central AGN, while the X-ray emission from extended gas tends to be more prominent in the $M_h \gtrsim 10^{13}h^{-1}M_\odot$ groups. In groups where the AGN play a major role in X-ray emission, the contribution from extended gas is minor, resulting in significant uncertainties concerning the extended X-ray emission. When the subset containing the X-ray detected counterparts is excluded, the extended gas component becomes easier to obtain. A correlation has been identified between the X-ray luminosity of the central AGN and extended gas. However, once we account for the positional offset, their correlation becomes less prominent. Currently, the results are not conclusive enough to confirm whether there is a connection between the AGN feedback and extended gas. However, they provide a new perspective on the feedback processes in the history of group assembly.

Submitted to arXiv on 18 Nov. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2511.14216v1

, , , , In this study, we utilize data from the first eROSITA all-sky survey (eRASS1) to delve into the contributions of active galactic nuclei (AGN) and extended gas to the overall X-ray luminosity ($L_X$) of galaxy groups with varying halo masses ($M_h$) at different redshifts. By leveraging multi-wavelength catalogs, including X-ray counterparts, the ASKAP radio catalog, and DESI spectroscopic measurements, we identify the presence of AGN in central galaxies. Employing a stacking method enables us to gather sufficient statistics for analyzing the X-ray surface brightness profile and $L_X$ for groups with diverse central AGN properties. Our findings reveal that X-ray groups exhibit the highest $L_X$, followed by groups with quasars (QSO), radio sources, BPT-AGN, and non-AGN centrals. Notably, in groups with $M_h \lesssim 10^{13}h^{-1}M_\odot$, central AGN dominate $L_X$, whereas in groups with $M_h \gtrsim 10^{13}h^{-1}M_\odot$, extended gas contributes more significantly to X-ray emission. Interestingly, when AGN play a major role in X-ray emission, the contribution from extended gas is minimal, leading to uncertainties regarding extended X-ray emission. Excluding subsets containing X-ray detected counterparts facilitates obtaining the extended gas component more easily. Furthermore, a correlation between the X-ray luminosity of central AGN and extended gas is observed; however, accounting for positional offsets diminishes this correlation's strength. While our results do not definitively confirm a connection between AGN feedback and extended gas, they offer fresh insights into feedback processes during group assembly history. Additionally, it is important to note that throughout this paper, we adopt a flat ΛCDM cosmology with parameters Ωm = 0.3089, Ωb = 0.0486, and H0 = 100h km/s/Mpc. The data analysis process involves intricate methodologies such as identification based on various catalogs and classification criteria for different types of central galaxies within galaxy groups. Overall, this comprehensive investigation sheds light on the complex interplay between AGN activity and extended gas in shaping the X-ray properties of galaxy groups across different halo masses and redshifts.
Created on 11 Mar. 2026

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.