Real-Time Reasoning Agents in Evolving Environments

AI-generated keywords: Artificial Intelligence Real-Time Reasoning Language Models Reactive Agents Planning Agents

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Real-time reasoning is crucial for artificial intelligence agents to make logical and timely judgments in dynamic environments.
  • Existing approaches in language model reasoning have struggled to effectively address the dynamic nature of environments.
  • A new problem formulation called real-time reasoning has been introduced to bridge this gap for agents operating in constantly changing environments.
  • The Real-Time Reasoning Gym was developed as a demonstration platform to showcase the practical implications of real-time reasoning.
  • Two paradigms for deploying language models in agents were explored: reactive agents with bounded reasoning computation for rapid responses, and planning agents with extended reasoning computation for complex problems.
  • AgileThinker was proposed as a solution that engages both reactive and planning paradigms simultaneously, outperforming single-paradigm agents in rigorous tests under task difficulty and time pressure.
  • AgileThinker balances reasoning depth and response latency effectively, making it a promising approach for developing AI systems capable of real-time decision-making in evolving environments.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yule Wen, Yixin Ye, Yanzhe Zhang, Diyi Yang, Hao Zhu

30 pages

Abstract: Agents in the real world must make not only logical but also timely judgments. This requires continuous awareness of the dynamic environment: hazards emerge, opportunities arise, and other agents act, while the agent's reasoning is still unfolding. Despite advances in language model reasoning, existing approaches fail to account for this dynamic nature. We introduce real-time reasoning as a new problem formulation for agents in evolving environments and build Real-Time Reasoning Gym to demonstrate it. We study two paradigms for deploying language models in agents: (1) reactive agents, which employ language models with bounded reasoning computation for rapid responses, and (2) planning agents, which allow extended reasoning computation for complex problems. Our experiments show that even state-of-the-art models struggle with making logical and timely judgments in either paradigm. To address this limitation, we propose AgileThinker, which simultaneously engages both reasoning paradigms. AgileThinker consistently outperforms agents engaging only one reasoning paradigm as the task difficulty and time pressure rise, effectively balancing reasoning depth and response latency. Our work establishes real-time reasoning as a critical testbed for developing practical agents and provides a foundation for research in temporally constrained AI systems, highlighting a path toward real-time capable agents.

Submitted to arXiv on 07 Nov. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2511.04898v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the realm of artificial intelligence, the ability for agents to make logical and timely judgments in dynamic environments is crucial. This necessitates a continuous awareness of emerging hazards, evolving opportunities, and the actions of other agents while their reasoning processes are still unfolding. Despite significant advancements in language model reasoning, existing approaches have fallen short in addressing this dynamic nature effectively. To bridge this gap, a new problem formulation called real-time reasoning has been introduced for agents operating in constantly changing environments. To showcase the practical implications of real-time reasoning, the Real-Time Reasoning Gym was developed as a demonstration platform. Within this framework, two distinct paradigms for deploying language models in agents were explored: reactive agents and planning agents. Reactive agents utilize language models with bounded reasoning computation to enable rapid responses, while planning agents allow for extended reasoning computation to tackle complex problems. Experimental findings revealed that even state-of-the-art models struggle to make logical and timely judgments within either paradigm alone. In response to this limitation, AgileThinker was proposed as a solution that simultaneously engages both reasoning paradigms. Through a series of rigorous tests, AgileThinker consistently outperformed agents that relied solely on one reasoning paradigm as task difficulty and time pressure increased. By effectively balancing reasoning depth and response latency, AgileThinker emerged as a promising approach for developing practical AI systems capable of real-time decision-making. This groundbreaking work not only establishes real-time reasoning as a critical testbed for advancing agent capabilities but also lays the foundation for research in temporally constrained AI systems. It highlights a clear pathway towards the development of real-time capable agents that can navigate evolving environments with agility and precision. The collaborative efforts of authors Yule Wen, Yixin Ye, Yanzhe Zhang, Diyi Yang, and Hao Zhu have significantly contributed to shaping the future landscape of AI technology through their innovative exploration of real-time reasoning in evolving environments.
Created on 11 Nov. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.