Lost in the Maze: Overcoming Context Limitations in Long-Horizon Agentic Search

AI-generated keywords: Long-horizon agentic search Context limitations SLIM framework Trajectory analysis Automated fine-grained analysis

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Long-horizon agentic search involves exploring the web over extended trajectories and synthesizing information from multiple sources for advanced applications.
  • Existing agentic search frameworks struggle with scaling to long trajectories due to context limitations, noisy content accumulation, exceeding context window and tool budgets, or premature termination.
  • Authors introduce SLIM (Simple Lightweight Information Management) as a framework that separates retrieval into distinct search and browse tools, maintaining concise context for longer and more focused searches.
  • Experimental evaluation shows that SLIM performs comparably at lower cost and with fewer tool calls compared to strong open-source baselines across various base models.
  • When using o3 as the base model, SLIM achieves 56% on BrowseComp and 31% on HLE tasks, surpassing all open-source frameworks by 8 and 4 absolute points respectively while requiring only 4-6 times fewer tool calls.
  • Authors release an automated fine-grained trajectory analysis pipeline along with an error taxonomy for characterizing long-horizon agentic search frameworks, showing that SLIM exhibits fewer hallucinations compared to previous systems.
  • The hope is that their analysis framework and simple tool design will guide future developments in long-horizon agents.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Howard Yen, Ashwin Paranjape, Mengzhou Xia, Thejas Venkatesh, Jack Hessel, Danqi Chen, Yuhao Zhang

Code and data are available here: https://github.com/howard-yen/SLIM

Abstract: Long-horizon agentic search requires iteratively exploring the web over long trajectories and synthesizing information across many sources, and is the foundation for enabling powerful applications like deep research systems. In this work, we show that popular agentic search frameworks struggle to scale to long trajectories primarily due to context limitations-they accumulate long, noisy content, hit context window and tool budgets, or stop early. Then, we introduce SLIM (Simple Lightweight Information Management), a simple framework that separates retrieval into distinct search and browse tools, and periodically summarizes the trajectory, keeping context concise while enabling longer, more focused searches. On long-horizon tasks, SLIM achieves comparable performance at substantially lower cost and with far fewer tool calls than strong open-source baselines across multiple base models. Specifically, with o3 as the base model, SLIM achieves 56% on BrowseComp and 31% on HLE, outperforming all open-source frameworks by 8 and 4 absolute points, respectively, while incurring 4-6x fewer tool calls. Finally, we release an automated fine-grained trajectory analysis pipeline and error taxonomy for characterizing long-horizon agentic search frameworks; SLIM exhibits fewer hallucinations than prior systems. We hope our analysis framework and simple tool design inform future long-horizon agents.

Submitted to arXiv on 21 Oct. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2510.18939v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their work titled "Lost in the Maze: Overcoming Context Limitations in Long-Horizon Agentic Search," authors Howard Yen, Ashwin Paranjape, Mengzhou Xia, Thejas Venkatesh, Jack Hessel, Danqi Chen, and Yuhao Zhang address the challenges of long-horizon agentic search. This type of search involves iteratively exploring the web over extended trajectories and synthesizing information from multiple sources to enable advanced applications like deep research systems. The authors highlight that existing agentic search frameworks struggle to scale to long trajectories due to context limitations. These frameworks often accumulate lengthy and noisy content, exceed context window and tool budgets, or terminate prematurely. To address these issues, the authors introduce SLIM (Simple Lightweight Information Management), a straightforward framework that separates retrieval into distinct search and browse tools. SLIM periodically summarizes the trajectory to maintain concise context while facilitating longer and more focused searches. Through experimental evaluation on long-horizon tasks, SLIM demonstrates comparable performance at significantly lower cost and with fewer tool calls compared to strong open-source baselines across various base models. Notably, when using o3 as the base model, SLIM achieves 56% on BrowseComp and 31% on HLE tasks, surpassing all open-source frameworks by 8 and 4 absolute points respectively while requiring only 4-6 times fewer tool calls. Furthermore,the authors release an automated fine-grained trajectory analysis pipeline along with an error taxonomy for characterizing long-horizon agentic search frameworks. They find that SLIM exhibits fewer hallucinations compared to previous systems. The hope is that their analysis framework and simple tool design will guide future developments in long-horizon agents. For those interested in exploring further,the code and data related to this study are available at https://github.com/howard-yen/SLIM.
Created on 29 Oct. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.