LLM Knowledge is Brittle: Truthfulness Representations Rely on Superficial Resemblance

AI-generated keywords: Large Language Models Knowledge Representation Brittleness Robustness Truthfulness Probes

AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Large Language Models (LLMs) face challenges in acquiring robust knowledge that can be effectively applied across various contexts beyond their training data.
LLMs exhibit brittleness in performance due to heightened sensitivity to minor input variations.
LLM representations encode the truthfulness of statements and enable differentiation between true and false assertions.
Internal representations of statement truthfulness deteriorate as sample presentations become less akin to those observed during initial model training.
LLMs heavily rely on precise surface form matching to differentiate between true and false statements.
LLMs may acquire shallow and non-robust knowledge representations that limit their generalizability potential.
Enhancing the robustness of acquired knowledge representations is crucial for improving LLM performance.

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Patrick Haller, Mark Ibrahim, Polina Kirichenko, Levent Sagun, Samuel J. Bell

arXiv: 2510.11905v1 - DOI (cs.CL)

License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

Abstract: For Large Language Models (LLMs) to be reliable, they must learn robust knowledge that can be generally applied in diverse settings -- often unlike those seen during training. Yet, extensive research has shown that LLM performance can be brittle, with models exhibiting excessive sensitivity to trivial input variations. In this work, we explore whether this brittleness is a direct result of unstable internal knowledge representations. To explore this question, we build on previous work showing that LLM representations encode statement truthfulness -- i.e., true, factual statements can be easily separated from false, inaccurate ones. Specifically, we test the robustness of learned knowledge by evaluating representation separability on samples that have undergone superficial transformations to drive them out-of-distribution (OOD), such as typos or reformulations. By applying semantically-preserving perturbations, we study how separability degrades as statements become more OOD, across four LLM families, five evaluation datasets, and three knowledge probing methods. Our results reveal that internal representations of statement truthfulness collapse as the samples' presentations become less similar to those seen during pre-training. While LLMs can often distinguish between true and false statements when they closely resemble the pre-training data, this ability is highly dependent on the statement's exact surface form. These findings offer a possible explanation for brittle benchmark performance: LLMs may learn shallow, non-robust knowledge representations that allow for only limited generalizability. Our work presents a fundamental challenge for the utility of truthfulness probes, and more broadly, calls for further research on improving the robustness of learned knowledge representations.

Submitted to arXiv on 13 Oct. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2510.11905v1

⚠This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

In their study titled "LLM Knowledge is Brittle: Truthfulness Representations Rely on Superficial Resemblance," authors Patrick Haller, Mark Ibrahim, Polina Kirichenko, Levent Sagun, and Samuel J. Bell delve into the challenges faced by Large Language Models (LLMs) in acquiring robust knowledge that can be effectively applied across various contexts beyond their training data. The researchers highlight a common issue of LLMs exhibiting brittleness in performance due to heightened sensitivity to minor input variations. Building upon prior research indicating that LLM representations encode the truthfulness of statements and enable differentiation between true and false assertions, the team investigates whether this brittleness stems from unstable internal knowledge representations within these models. To address this question, they conduct experiments using semantically-preserving perturbations to assess the robustness of learned knowledge. Their findings reveal a concerning trend wherein internal representations of statement truthfulness deteriorate as sample presentations become less akin to those observed during initial model training. While LLMs demonstrate an ability to differentiate between true and false statements when closely resembling pre-training data, this capability heavily relies on precise surface form matching. Consequently, the study suggests that LLMs may acquire shallow and non-robust knowledge representations that limit their generalizability potential. These insights provide a plausible explanation for the observed brittle benchmark performance in LLMs and underscore the critical need for enhancing the robustness of acquired knowledge representations through further research efforts. Overall, this work poses a fundamental challenge to existing truthfulness probes' utility while advocating for continued exploration into strategies aimed at bolstering the resilience and adaptability of learned knowledge within Large Language Models.

- Large Language Models (LLMs) face challenges in acquiring robust knowledge that can be effectively applied across various contexts beyond their training data.
- LLMs exhibit brittleness in performance due to heightened sensitivity to minor input variations.
- LLM representations encode the truthfulness of statements and enable differentiation between true and false assertions.
- Internal representations of statement truthfulness deteriorate as sample presentations become less akin to those observed during initial model training.
- LLMs heavily rely on precise surface form matching to differentiate between true and false statements.
- LLMs may acquire shallow and non-robust knowledge representations that limit their generalizability potential.
- Enhancing the robustness of acquired knowledge representations is crucial for improving LLM performance.

Summary- Big talking computers have trouble learning and using information in different situations. - These computers can make mistakes easily because they are very sensitive to small changes in what they are told. - They can tell if something is true or false and understand the difference. - But, their ability to do this gets worse when they see things that are different from what they learned before. - These computers need exact matches to know if something is true or false. Definitions- Large Language Models (LLMs): Big talking computers that try to understand and generate human language. - Robust: Strong and reliable, able to work well in many different situations. - Brittleness: Being fragile or easily broken, not able to handle changes well. - Truthfulness: Being honest and accurate, telling the truth. - Assertions: Statements or claims made by someone.

Introduction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have been making headlines in recent years for their impressive performance on a variety of natural language processing tasks. These models, such as GPT-3 and BERT, are trained on massive amounts of text data and can generate human-like text responses to prompts. However, a recent study by Patrick Haller, Mark Ibrahim, Polina Kirichenko, Levent Sagun, and Samuel J. Bell has shed light on a critical issue faced by LLMs - brittleness in knowledge acquisition. In their paper titled "LLM Knowledge is Brittle: Truthfulness Representations Rely on Superficial Resemblance," the authors delve into the challenges faced by LLMs in acquiring robust knowledge that can be effectively applied across various contexts beyond their training data. The researchers highlight how this brittleness stems from unstable internal knowledge representations within these models and provide insights into potential solutions for improving LLM performance.

The Problem of Brittleness in Large Language Models

One of the key issues with LLMs is their sensitivity to minor input variations. This means that even small changes in the input can significantly impact the model's output. For example, changing one word or phrase in a prompt can result in an entirely different response from the model. This heightened sensitivity is particularly concerning when it comes to statements' truthfulness representation - an essential aspect of natural language understanding. Previous research has shown that LLM representations encode the truthfulness of statements and enable differentiation between true and false assertions. However, this capability heavily relies on precise surface form matching. To investigate this further, Haller et al. conducted experiments using semantically-preserving perturbations to assess the robustness of learned knowledge within LLMs.

The Experiment

The team used two popular pre-trained models - RoBERTa and BERT - and evaluated their performance on a truthfulness classification task. They used the FEVER dataset, which contains over 185,000 claims from Wikipedia that are labeled as either true or false. The researchers then introduced various perturbations to the input data, such as changing word order, replacing words with synonyms or antonyms, and adding negation. These perturbations were designed to preserve the semantic meaning of the original statement while altering its surface form.

Results

The results of the experiment revealed a concerning trend - as sample presentations became less similar to those observed during initial model training, internal representations of statement truthfulness deteriorated significantly. In other words, LLMs struggled to differentiate between true and false statements when presented with inputs that differed from their pre-training data. This finding suggests that LLMs may acquire shallow and non-robust knowledge representations due to their reliance on precise surface form matching. As a result, these models may struggle to generalize beyond their training data and perform poorly in real-world applications where input variations are inevitable.

Implications for Future Research

This study poses a fundamental challenge to existing truthfulness probes' utility while highlighting the critical need for further research efforts aimed at enhancing the robustness of acquired knowledge representations within Large Language Models. One potential solution suggested by Haller et al. is incorporating adversarial training techniques into LLM training processes. Adversarial training involves exposing models to intentionally crafted inputs designed to improve their resilience against perturbations. This approach has shown promising results in improving model performance on various tasks and could potentially address brittleness in LLMs' knowledge acquisition process. Additionally, future studies could explore alternative methods for evaluating LLM performance beyond traditional benchmark datasets like FEVER. This would provide a more comprehensive understanding of how these models handle real-world scenarios where input variations are prevalent.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the study by Haller et al. highlights a critical challenge faced by Large Language Models - brittleness in knowledge acquisition. The researchers' experiments reveal that LLMs may acquire shallow and non-robust knowledge representations due to their heightened sensitivity to minor input variations. This finding has significant implications for the utility of existing truthfulness probes and underscores the need for continued research efforts aimed at improving LLM performance through enhanced robustness of acquired knowledge representations. With further exploration and development, we can potentially overcome this limitation and unlock the full potential of Large Language Models in various real-world applications.

Created on 11 Nov. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.