Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2510.01171v3

In their paper titled "Verbalized Sampling: How to Mitigate Mode Collapse and Unlock LLM Diversity," authors Jiayi Zhang, Simon Yu, Derek Chong, Anthony Sicilia, Michael R. Tomz, Christopher D. Manning, and Weiyan Shi address the issue of post-training alignment reducing diversity in Large Language Models (LLMs), leading to mode collapse. is a straightforward prompting strategy introduced by the authors to combat this issue. It prompts the model to verbalize a probability distribution over a set of responses, such as generating jokes about coffee with corresponding probabilities. While previous studies attribute mode collapse to algorithmic limitations, the authors identify in preference data as a fundamental data-level driver. This bias stems from annotators favoring familiar text due to . The authors formalize this bias theoretically and validate it on preference datasets empirically, demonstrating its central role in mode collapse. Extensive experiments across various tasks like creative writing (poems, stories, jokes), dialogue simulation, open-ended QA, and synthetic data generation show that VS significantly enhances performance without compromising factual accuracy or safety. For instance,in creative writing tasks, The authors also observe that more advanced models benefit more from VS. In conclusion,this work offers a fresh data-centric perspective on mode collapse and presents an effective inference-time solution through Verbalized Sampling.By addressing typicality bias in preference data,this approach helps unlock generative diversity in pre-trained models for improved performance across multiple applications.

• - Authors address the issue of post-training alignment reducing diversity in Large Language Models (LLMs), leading to mode collapse
• - Verbalized Sampling is introduced as a strategy to combat mode collapse by prompting the model to verbalize a probability distribution over a set of responses
• - Bias in preference data, where annotators favor familiar text, is identified as a fundamental data-level driver of mode collapse
• - Extensive experiments across various tasks show that Verbalized Sampling significantly enhances performance without compromising factual accuracy or safety
• - More advanced models benefit more from Verbalized Sampling
• - This work offers a fresh data-centric perspective on mode collapse and presents an effective inference-time solution through Verbalized Sampling

Summary- Authors talk about a problem where after training, some big language models become less diverse, which is called mode collapse. - They introduce Verbalized Sampling as a way to help prevent mode collapse by making the model explain its guesses in different ways. - They found that one reason for mode collapse is bias in the data used to teach the model, where people prefer familiar text. - Tests show that Verbalized Sampling can make models work better without making mistakes or being unsafe. - The more advanced a model is, the more it can improve with Verbalized Sampling. Definitions- Large Language Models (LLMs): Big computer programs that understand and generate human-like language. - Mode Collapse: When a model becomes less creative and only gives similar answers. - Bias: Unfair preferences or opinions that affect how something works.

Introduction

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in various natural language processing tasks, such as text generation, dialogue simulation, and question-answering. However, recent studies have highlighted a concerning issue with these models - mode collapse. Mode collapse refers to the phenomenon where LLMs tend to generate similar or repetitive responses instead of diverse and creative ones. In their paper titled "Verbalized Sampling: How to Mitigate Mode Collapse and Unlock LLM Diversity," authors Jiayi Zhang, Simon Yu, Derek Chong, Anthony Sicilia, Michael R. Tomz, Christopher D. Manning, and Weiyan Shi address this issue by introducing a straightforward prompting strategy called Verbalized Sampling (VS). This approach prompts the model to verbalize a probability distribution over a set of responses rather than generating a single response.

The Problem of Mode Collapse

Mode collapse in LLMs has been attributed to algorithmic limitations in previous studies. However, the authors identify another crucial factor contributing to this problem - bias in preference data. Preference data is used for training LLMs and consists of human annotations that indicate which response they prefer out of a set of options. The authors argue that annotators tend to favor familiar text due to their own personal preferences or biases towards certain topics or writing styles. This leads to an imbalanced dataset where some responses are preferred more than others based on subjective factors rather than objective quality.

Formalizing Bias in Preference Data

To support their argument about bias in preference data being a fundamental driver of mode collapse,the authors formalize it theoretically using concepts from information theory.They introduce the concept of typicality bias which refers to the tendency for humans to prefer typical or familiar text over atypical or unfamiliar text.This bias is quantified using Shannon entropy,a measure commonly used in information theory.The higher the entropy,the more diverse and unpredictable the data is. The authors show that preference data has a lower Shannon entropy compared to other types of datasets,indicating a higher degree of typicality bias.This means that LLMs trained on such data will also exhibit this bias and generate responses that are similar or familiar rather than diverse and creative.

The Solution: Verbalized Sampling

To address this issue,the authors propose Verbalized Sampling (VS) as an inference-time solution.VS prompts the model to verbalize a probability distribution over a set of responses,rather than generating a single response.This allows for more diversity in the generated outputs as the model is not constrained to choosing one preferred response. The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of VS through extensive experiments across various tasks like creative writing (poems, stories, jokes), dialogue simulation, open-ended QA, and synthetic data generation. They compare VS with other state-of-the-art methods for mitigating mode collapse and show that it significantly outperforms them in terms of diversity while maintaining factual accuracy and safety.

Benefits for Advanced Models

One interesting observation made by the authors is that more advanced models benefit even more from VS compared to simpler ones. This can be attributed to their ability to capture complex patterns in language better. By using VS, these models are able to generate diverse outputs without compromising their performance on other metrics.

Conclusion

In conclusion,this work offers a fresh perspective on mode collapse in LLMs by identifying typicality bias in preference data as a fundamental driver. The proposed approach - Verbalized Sampling - effectively addresses this issue by prompting the model to verbalize its probability distribution over multiple responses instead of generating one preferred response. Extensive experiments across various tasks demonstrate its effectiveness in unlocking generative diversity without compromising performance or safety. This research opens up new possibilities for improving LLMs' performance in various natural language processing tasks and highlights the importance of considering bias in preference data.