Emission line tracers of galactic outflows driven by stellar feedback in simulations of isolated disk galaxies

AI-generated keywords: galactic outflows

AI-generated Key Points

  • Hydrodynamic simulations are crucial for studying galactic outflows and connecting observable characteristics to physical conditions of outflowing gas.
  • Simulations of isolated disk galaxies using FIRE-2 subgrid models explored multiphase galactic outflows across different mass ranges.
  • Synthetic spectra generated for common outflow tracers allowed for measurement of properties like mass outflow rate, kinetic power, and momentum flux.
  • Observations showed good alignment with actual data in [CII]$_{158\rm{\mu m}}$ but significant discrepancies in $\mathrm{CO}_{J(1-0)}$ due to uncertainties in electron density measurements.
  • Molecular outflows were found to be sensitive to the conversion factor between CO luminosity and H2 mass, causing variations in outflow rates especially in lower-mass galaxies.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Elliot L. Howatson, Alexander J. Richings, Elke Roediger, Claude-Andre Faucher-Giguere, Tom Theuns, Yuankang Liu, Tsang Keung Chan, Oliver Thompson, Cody Carr, Daniel Angles-Alcazar

arXiv: 2509.21295v1 - DOI (astro-ph.GA)
19 pages, 14 figures. Accepted for publication in MNRAS
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Hydrodynamic simulations can connect outflow observables to the physical conditions of outflowing gas. Here, we use simulations of isolated disk galaxies ranging from dwarf mass ($M_{200} = 10^{10}\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$) to Milky Way mass ($M_{200} = 10^{12}\mathrm{M}_{\odot}$), based on the FIRE-2 subgrid models to investigate multiphase galactic outflows. We use the CHIMES non-equilibrium chemistry module to create synthetic spectra of common outflow tracers ([CII]$_{158\rm{\mu m}}$, $\mathrm{CO}_{J(1-0)}$, H$\alpha$ and $[\mathrm{OIII}]_{5007\text{A}}$). Using our synthetic spectra we measure the mass outflow rate, kinetic power and momentum flux using observational techniques. In [CII]$_{158\rm{\mu m}}$ we measure outflow rates of $10^{-4}$ to $1$ $\mathrm{M_{\odot}yr^{-1}}$ across an SFR range of $10^{-3}$ to $1$ $\text{M}_{\odot}\text{yr}^{-1}$, which is in reasonable agreement with observations. The significant discrepancy is in $\mathrm{CO}_{J(1-0)}$, with the simulations lying $\approx1$ dex below the observational sample. We test observational assumptions used to derive outflow properties from synthetic spectra. We find the greatest uncertainty lies in measurements of electron density, as estimates using the SII doublet can overestimate the actual electron density by up to 2 dex, which changes mass outflow rates by up to 4 dex. We also find that molecular outflows are especially sensitive to the conversion factor between CO luminosity and H2 mass, with outflow rates changing by up to 4 dex in our least massive galaxy. Comparing the outflow properties derived from the synthetic spectra to those derived directly from the simulation, we find that [CII]$_{158\rm{\mu m}}$ probes outflows at greater distances from the disk, whilst we find that molecular gas does not survive at large distances within outflows within our modestly star-forming disk galaxies simulated in this work.

Submitted to arXiv on 25 Sep. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2509.21295v1

, , , , In the study of galactic outflows, hydrodynamic simulations play a crucial role in connecting observable characteristics of outflows to the physical conditions of the outflowing gas. This particular investigation conducted simulations of isolated disk galaxies using FIRE-2 subgrid models to explore multiphase galactic outflows across a range of dwarf to Milky Way masses. By employing the CHIMES non-equilibrium chemistry module, synthetic spectra were generated for common outflow tracers such as [CII]$_{158\rm{\mu m}}$, $\mathrm{CO}_{J(1-0)}$, H$\alpha$, and $[\mathrm{OIII}]_{5007\text{A}}$. The analysis of these synthetic spectra allowed for the measurement of various outflow properties using observational techniques, including mass outflow rate, kinetic power, and momentum flux. Notably, in [CII]$_{158\rm{\mu m}}$ observations, outflow rates aligned reasonably well with actual observations across a star formation rate (SFR) range. However, a significant discrepancy was found in $\mathrm{CO}_{J(1-0)}$ where simulations fell approximately 1 dex below observational data. Further investigation revealed that uncertainties in measurements of electron density could lead to overestimations by up to 2 dex, resulting in changes in mass outflow rates by up to 4 dex. Additionally, molecular outflows were found to be particularly sensitive to the conversion factor between CO luminosity and H2 mass, causing variations in outflow rates by up to 4 dex in lower-mass galaxies. Comparisons between derived properties from synthetic spectra and those directly from simulations indicated that [CII]$_{158\rm{\mu m}}$ probes outflows at greater distances from the disk. Interestingly, it was observed that molecular gas did not survive at large distances within the modestly star-forming disk galaxies simulated in this study. Expanding on existing literature regarding galactic outflows simulation studies reveals a diverse range of approaches, including cosmological large-volume simulations like EAGLE and TNG50, zoom-in simulations such as FIRE-2 and AURIGA, and idealized isolated galaxy simulations like SILCC and TIGRESS. These various simulation approaches contribute significantly towards unraveling the complexities surrounding galactic outflows driven by stellar feedback mechanisms.
Created on 01 Oct. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.