Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2508.21204v1

In this study, we investigate the impact of architectural inductive biases on the cognitive behavior of large language models (LLMs) during instructional dialogue. We introduce a symbolic scaffolding mechanism and a short-term memory schema to facilitate adaptive and structured reasoning in Socratic tutoring scenarios. Through controlled ablation experiments across five system variants, we assess model outputs using expert-designed rubrics that cover aspects such as scaffolding, responsiveness, symbolic reasoning, and conversational memory. Our preliminary results show that our full system consistently outperforms baseline variants. Specifically, removing memory or symbolic structure leads to a degradation of key cognitive behaviors including abstraction, adaptive probing, and conceptual continuity. These findings support the importance of architectural scaffolds in shaping emergent instructional strategies within LLMs. Furthermore, we make our code and annotations publicly available upon acceptance for increased transparency and reproducibility. The preprint serves as a high-throughput behavioral screening method for early experimental stages. Our contributions include the development of a modular natural language boundary architecture incorporating fuzzy, symbolic scaffolding; a short-term memory schema for turn-by-turn cognitive control; a prompt-level symbolic loop for real-time strategy modulation; and an evaluation framework adapted from instructional science. We also discuss related work on schemas as controllers, memory-augmented LMs, fuzzy reasoning techniques, and interpretability methods. By foregrounding symbolic interpretability through schema-guided reasoning and embedding structure at inference time to produce interpretable responses aligned with pedagogical principles, we aim to advance operational cognition in LLMs. This approach emphasizes session-level coherence and dynamic adaptivity while supporting interpretability—a hallmark of cognitive control—rather than solely probing black-box behavior.

• - Investigating impact of architectural inductive biases on cognitive behavior of large language models (LLMs) during instructional dialogue
• - Introducing symbolic scaffolding mechanism and short-term memory schema for adaptive and structured reasoning in Socratic tutoring scenarios
• - Assessing model outputs through controlled ablation experiments across five system variants using expert-designed rubrics covering aspects such as scaffolding, responsiveness, symbolic reasoning, and conversational memory
• - Preliminary results show full system consistently outperforms baseline variants; removing memory or symbolic structure leads to degradation of key cognitive behaviors including abstraction, adaptive probing, and conceptual continuity
• - Importance of architectural scaffolds in shaping emergent instructional strategies within LLMs supported by findings
• - Making code and annotations publicly available for transparency and reproducibility upon acceptance
• - Contributions include development of modular natural language boundary architecture with fuzzy, symbolic scaffolding; short-term memory schema for turn-by-turn cognitive control; prompt-level symbolic loop for real-time strategy modulation; and evaluation framework adapted from instructional science
• - Discussing related work on schemas as controllers, memory-augmented LMs, fuzzy reasoning techniques, and interpretability methods
• - Emphasizing foregrounding symbolic interpretability through schema-guided reasoning to advance operational cognition in LLMs with session-level coherence, dynamic adaptivity, and interpretability support

SummaryResearchers are studying how the design of big talking computers can affect how they learn. They are adding special tools to help these computers think better during teaching conversations. They are testing different versions of the computer to see which one works best using expert-made checklists. The tests show that having a good memory and clear thinking tools helps the computer do well in learning tasks. Using these tools is important for making the computer smarter. Definitions- Architectural inductive biases: Special rules built into a computer program to help it learn and think better. - Cognitive behavior: How a computer's mind works, like remembering things or solving problems. - Large language models (LLMs): Big computers that can understand and generate human-like language. - Symbolic scaffolding mechanism: Tools added to help organize thoughts and solve problems in a structured way. - Short-term memory schema: A system for temporarily storing information for quick use. - Adaptive reasoning: Changing how you think based on new information or situations. - Socratic tutoring scenarios: Teaching situations where students are guided to discover answers on their own through questioning. - Controlled ablation experiments: Tests where specific parts of a system are removed to see how it affects performance. - Rubrics: Checklists or guidelines used for evaluation or scoring. - Emergent instructional strategies: New teaching methods that arise from using certain tools or techniques effectively.

Introduction: In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable progress in natural language processing tasks such as question-answering and text generation. However, there is still a lack of understanding about how these models process information and make decisions. This has raised concerns about the potential biases and limitations of LLMs in real-world applications. In this study, researchers investigate the impact of architectural inductive biases on the cognitive behavior of LLMs during instructional dialogue. The goal is to understand how different design choices can affect the model's ability to reason and adapt in Socratic tutoring scenarios. Background: The use of LLMs for instructional dialogue has gained attention due to their potential for personalized learning experiences. However, existing research has mainly focused on improving performance metrics without considering the underlying cognitive processes involved. To address this gap, the researchers propose a symbolic scaffolding mechanism and a short-term memory schema that aim to facilitate adaptive and structured reasoning in LLMs during instructional dialogue. These mechanisms are inspired by principles from instructional science, which emphasizes the importance of scaffolding and memory support for effective learning. Methodology: To evaluate their proposed approach, the researchers conduct controlled ablation experiments across five system variants. They use expert-designed rubrics that cover aspects such as scaffolding, responsiveness, symbolic reasoning, and conversational memory to assess model outputs. Results: Preliminary results show that the full system consistently outperforms baseline variants. Removing memory or symbolic structure leads to a degradation of key cognitive behaviors including abstraction, adaptive probing, and conceptual continuity. These findings highlight the importance of architectural scaffolds in shaping emergent instructional strategies within LLMs. Contributions: This study makes several contributions towards advancing operational cognition in LLMs for instructional dialogue. First, it introduces a modular natural language boundary architecture incorporating fuzzy symbolic scaffolding that allows for flexible interpretation of input data while maintaining interpretability at inference time. Second, the researchers propose a short-term memory schema that enables turn-by-turn cognitive control in LLMs. This mechanism allows for dynamic adaptivity and supports session-level coherence, which is crucial for effective instructional dialogue. Third, they introduce a prompt-level symbolic loop that modulates real-time strategy based on the model's current state. This approach helps to maintain interpretability while also improving performance. Finally, the study presents an evaluation framework adapted from instructional science to assess LLM outputs. This framework can be used as a high-throughput behavioral screening method for early experimental stages. Related Work: The proposed approach builds upon previous research on schemas as controllers, memory-augmented LMs, fuzzy reasoning techniques, and interpretability methods. By incorporating these ideas into their design choices, the researchers aim to address some of the limitations of existing LLMs in instructional dialogue scenarios. Conclusion: In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of architectural inductive biases in shaping emergent instructional strategies within LLMs. The proposed mechanisms of symbolic scaffolding and short-term memory schema have shown promising results in improving key cognitive behaviors such as abstraction and adaptive probing. The use of expert-designed rubrics and an evaluation framework adapted from instructional science adds rigor to the assessment process and increases transparency and reproducibility. Additionally, by making their code and annotations publicly available upon acceptance, the researchers promote open science practices. Future work could explore other design choices or combinations of mechanisms to further improve model performance while maintaining interpretability. Overall, this study contributes towards advancing operational cognition in LLMs for instructional dialogue scenarios and emphasizes the importance of considering cognitive processes when designing AI systems for education purposes.