The <Organization> Hermes 4 Technical Report delves into the intricacies of the hybrid reasoning models that make up the Hermes 4 family. These models are designed to blend structured, multi-turn reasoning with a broad instruction-following capability. The report outlines the challenges faced during data curation, synthesis, training, and evaluation processes and offers insights into the solutions implemented to tackle these challenges at scale. One notable aspect discussed in the report is the creation of taxonomies for data-scarce domains. By generating a taxonomy of subdomains and prompts, researchers were able to organize and categorize information effectively. This approach involved using a depth-first-search style recursion to enumerate subdomains within a domain and identify indivisible subdomains based on model feedback. Additionally, the report highlights the use of synthetic personas through PersonaHub in scenarios involving users or participants. By simulating human behavior using synthetic personas, researchers were able to generate diverse application and script implementation tasks. This method proved useful in enhancing model understanding and performance in user-centric domains. Furthermore, the report showcases specific tasks generated by the models such as creating multiple-choice questions about the Periodic Table in JSON format with escaped commas in choice texts. It also presents a task related to fixing a disease tracking dashboard using TypeScript/React code. Overall, the Hermes 4 Technical Report provides a comprehensive evaluation across various benchmarks including mathematical reasoning, coding proficiency, knowledge comprehension, and alignment metrics. Both quantitative performance metrics and qualitative behavioral analysis are reported in detail. To promote open research practices,<Organization> all model weights are made publicly available for further exploration and development.
- - Hybrid reasoning models of the Hermes 4 family blend structured, multi-turn reasoning with broad instruction-following capability
- - Challenges faced during data curation, synthesis, training, and evaluation processes were addressed at scale
- - Creation of taxonomies for data-scarce domains involved generating subdomains and prompts to organize information effectively
- - Use of synthetic personas through PersonaHub helped simulate human behavior for diverse application and script implementation tasks
- - Specific tasks generated by the models include creating multiple-choice questions about the Periodic Table in JSON format and fixing a disease tracking dashboard using TypeScript/React code
- - The report provides a comprehensive evaluation across benchmarks such as mathematical reasoning, coding proficiency, knowledge comprehension, and alignment metrics
- - Model weights are publicly available for further exploration and development to promote open research practices
Summary- The Hermes 4 family uses a mix of structured reasoning and following instructions well.
- Challenges in handling data were solved on a large scale.
- Making categories for areas with little data involved creating smaller groups and cues to organize information better.
- Using fake people through PersonaHub helped copy human behavior for different tasks.
- The models can do things like making questions about the Periodic Table and fixing a dashboard.
Definitions- Hybrid: A mix of two or more different things
- Curation: Organizing and taking care of something, like data
- Taxonomies: Systems for organizing information into groups or categories
- Synthetic: Made to imitate something real
- Benchmarks: Standards used for comparison or evaluation
Introduction:
The Hermes 4 Technical Report is a comprehensive study that explores the intricacies of hybrid reasoning models used in the Hermes 4 family. These models are designed to combine structured, multi-turn reasoning with a broad instruction-following capability. The report delves into the challenges faced during data curation, synthesis, training, and evaluation processes and offers insights into the solutions implemented to tackle these challenges at scale.
Data Curation and Taxonomy Creation:
One significant aspect discussed in the report is the creation of taxonomies for data-scarce domains. This process involved organizing and categorizing information effectively by generating a taxonomy of subdomains and prompts. To achieve this, researchers used a depth-first-search style recursion to enumerate subdomains within a domain and identify indivisible subdomains based on model feedback.
This approach proved useful in handling data-scarce domains as it allowed for efficient organization and categorization of information. By creating taxonomies, researchers were able to better understand the relationships between different concepts within a domain and improve model performance.
Synthetic Personas through PersonaHub:
Another noteworthy aspect highlighted in the report is the use of synthetic personas through PersonaHub in scenarios involving users or participants. Synthetic personas are simulated human behaviors that can be generated using various tools such as PersonaHub.
By incorporating synthetic personas into their research, researchers were able to generate diverse application and script implementation tasks. This method proved useful in enhancing model understanding and performance in user-centric domains.
Tasks Generated by Models:
The Hermes 4 Technical Report also showcases specific tasks generated by the models. These tasks include creating multiple-choice questions about the Periodic Table in JSON format with escaped commas in choice texts, as well as fixing a disease tracking dashboard using TypeScript/React code.
These tasks demonstrate how versatile these hybrid reasoning models can be when applied to different domains. They also showcase their ability to handle complex tasks involving coding proficiency and knowledge comprehension.
Evaluation Metrics:
To evaluate the performance of the Hermes 4 family, the report presents a comprehensive evaluation across various benchmarks. These include mathematical reasoning, coding proficiency, knowledge comprehension, and alignment metrics. Both quantitative performance metrics and qualitative behavioral analysis are reported in detail.
By using a combination of different evaluation methods, researchers were able to provide a thorough assessment of the models' capabilities. This allows for a better understanding of their strengths and limitations.
Open Research Practices:
In line with open research practices, has made all model weights publicly available for further exploration and development. This promotes transparency and collaboration within the research community, allowing for continuous improvement and advancement in hybrid reasoning models.
Conclusion:
The Hermes 4 Technical Report provides valuable insights into the development and application of hybrid reasoning models in the Hermes 4 family. It highlights the challenges faced during data curation, synthesis, training, and evaluation processes and offers solutions to overcome these challenges at scale.
Through its use of taxonomies for data-scarce domains, synthetic personas through PersonaHub, diverse tasks generated by models, comprehensive evaluation metrics, and open research practices, has demonstrated its commitment to advancing research in this field. The report serves as a valuable resource for those interested in hybrid reasoning models and their potential applications in various domains.