Local compactness does not always imply spatiality

AI-generated keywords: Pointfree topology locally compact frame spatiality MT-algebras N\"obeling's Spatiality Theorem

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Locally compact frames are typically believed to be spatial in pointfree topology
  • Recent study by G. Bezhanishvili et al. introduced a counterexample: locally compact sober MT-algebra that is not spatial
  • Discovery challenges the relationship between separation axioms in pointfree topology and those in MT-algebras
  • Study focused on nontrivial $T_{1/2}$-algebras, particularly examining closed atoms within these structures
  • Generalization of N\"obeling's Spatiality Theorem: every locally compact $T_{1/2}$-algebra is spatial
  • Link established between closed atoms and the axiom of choice
  • Findings challenge existing notions in pointfree topology and enhance understanding of MT-algebras and their spatial properties
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: G. Bezhanishvili, S. D. Melzer, R. Raviprakash, A. L. Suarez

18 pages

Abstract: It is a well-known result in pointfree topology that every locally compact frame is spatial. Whether this result extends to MT-algebras (McKinsey-Tarski algebras) was an open problem. We resolve it in the negative by constructing a locally compact sober MT-algebra which is not spatial. We also revisit N\"obeling's largely overlooked approach to pointfree topology from the 1950s. We show that his separation axioms are closely related to those in the theory of MT-algebras with the notable exception of Hausdorffness. We prove that N\"obeling's Spatiality Theorem implies the well-known Isbell Spatiality Theorem. We then generalize N\"obeling's Spatiality Theorem by proving that each locally compact $T_{1/2}$-algebra is spatial. The proof utilizes the fact that every nontrivial $T_{1/2}$-algebra contains a closed atom, which we show is equivalent to the axiom of choice.

Submitted to arXiv on 03 Aug. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2508.01645v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the field of pointfree topology, it is well-established that every locally compact frame is spatial. However, a recent study by G. Bezhanishvili et al. has challenged this belief by constructing a counterexample in the form of a locally compact sober MT-algebra that defies spatiality. This groundbreaking discovery not only sheds light on the relationship between separation axioms in pointfree topology and those in the realm of MT-algebras but also reveals new connections between different fundamental principles in topology theory. Through their meticulous examination of nontrivial $T_{1/2}$-algebras and their properties, particularly focusing on the presence of closed atoms within these structures, the researchers were able to generalize N\"obeling's Spatiality Theorem and establish that every locally compact $T_{1/2}$-algebra is indeed spatial. Notably, this generalization also highlights the intricate link between closed atoms and the axiom of choice—a foundational concept in mathematics. This study not only challenges existing notions in pointfree topology but also enriches our understanding of MT-algebras and their spatial properties. By bridging gaps between different theories and uncovering new connections within the mathematical landscape, these findings pave the way for further exploration and advancement in topological research.
Created on 17 Aug. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.