Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2508.01191v3

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs) has been a topic of interest due to its potential to improve model performance on various tasks by mimicking human-like reasoning steps. However, recent findings suggest that CoT reasoning may not be as robust as initially perceived. In this study, the authors delve deeper into CoT reasoning through a data distribution lens to investigate if it reflects a structured inductive bias learned from in-distribution data. The study dissects CoT reasoning along three dimensions: task structure, reasoning length, and query format. To explore these dimensions thoroughly, the authors introduce DataAlchemy, an isolated environment designed for training LLMs from scratch and systematically probing them under various distribution conditions. The results of their experiments reveal that CoT reasoning is fragile and prone to failure when pushed beyond the boundaries of training distributions. The implications for practitioners are significant. It is crucial to guard against over-reliance on CoT reasoning and false confidence in LLMs' abilities, especially in critical domains like medicine or finance. Auditing by domain experts is essential to ensure the reliability of the models. Additionally, standard validation practices may not be sufficient to assess the true robustness of CoT-enabled systems; hence, rigorous out-of-distribution testing is recommended. Furthermore, while Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) can temporarily improve model performance on specific data distributions, it should not be seen as a solution for achieving true generalization. Relying solely on SFT to address out-of-distribution failures overlooks the core issue of abstract reasoning capability within LLMs. In conclusion, this study sheds light on the brittleness and superficiality of current CoT reasoning capabilities in LLMs. By understanding the limitations and challenges associated with CoT reasoning through a data distribution lens, both practitioners and researchers can gain valuable insights for developing more reliable and generalizable models in the future.

• - Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs) has potential to improve model performance by mimicking human-like reasoning steps
• - Recent findings suggest CoT reasoning may not be as robust as initially perceived
• - Study investigates if CoT reasoning reflects a structured inductive bias learned from in-distribution data
• - Three dimensions dissected: task structure, reasoning length, and query format
• - DataAlchemy introduced for training LLMs and probing under various distribution conditions
• - CoT reasoning is fragile and prone to failure beyond training distributions
• - Guard against over-reliance on CoT reasoning and false confidence in LLMs' abilities, especially in critical domains like medicine or finance
• - Auditing by domain experts essential for model reliability
• - Rigorous out-of-distribution testing recommended to assess true robustness of CoT-enabled systems
• - Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) can temporarily improve performance but not a solution for true generalization; abstract reasoning capability within LLMs is core issue
• - Study highlights brittleness and superficiality of current CoT reasoning capabilities in LLMs; understanding limitations crucial for developing more reliable models

Summary- Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs) helps models think like humans by following steps. - Some recent discoveries show that CoT reasoning may not be as strong as we thought. - A study is checking if CoT reasoning comes from patterns learned from data. - The study looks at task structure, how long the reasoning is, and how questions are asked. - DataAlchemy is a method for training LLMs under different conditions. Definitions- Chain-of-Thought (CoT): A way of thinking where ideas are connected in a sequence. - Large Language Models (LLMs): Computer programs that understand and generate human language. - Robust: Strong and reliable. - Inductive bias: Patterns learned from data to make predictions or decisions. - Distribution: How data is spread out or divided.

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs) has been a topic of great interest in the field of artificial intelligence. CoT reasoning refers to the ability of LLMs to perform human-like reasoning steps, which has the potential to improve model performance on various tasks. However, recent research suggests that CoT reasoning may not be as robust as initially perceived. In this study, titled "Dissecting Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models through a Data Distribution Lens," authors delve deeper into CoT reasoning and its limitations. The study aims to investigate if CoT reasoning reflects a structured inductive bias learned from in-distribution data. To explore this question thoroughly, the authors introduce DataAlchemy, an isolated environment designed for training LLMs from scratch and systematically probing them under various distribution conditions. This approach allows for a more comprehensive understanding of CoT reasoning by dissecting it along three dimensions: task structure, reasoning length, and query format. The results of their experiments reveal that while CoT reasoning may work well within specific data distributions, it is fragile and prone to failure when pushed beyond these boundaries. This finding has significant implications for practitioners who rely on LLMs for critical tasks such as medicine or finance. It highlights the need for caution against over-reliance on CoT reasoning and false confidence in LLMs' abilities. One key takeaway from this study is the importance of auditing by domain experts to ensure the reliability of LLMs. As demonstrated by their findings, standard validation practices may not be sufficient to assess the true robustness of CoT-enabled systems; hence rigorous out-of-distribution testing is recommended. Furthermore, while Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) can temporarily improve model performance on specific data distributions, it should not be seen as a solution for achieving true generalization. Relying solely on SFT overlooks the core issue of abstract reasoning capability within LLMs. In conclusion, this study sheds light on the brittleness and superficiality of current CoT reasoning capabilities in LLMs. By understanding the limitations and challenges associated with CoT reasoning through a data distribution lens, both practitioners and researchers can gain valuable insights for developing more reliable and generalizable models in the future. Overall, this research paper highlights the need for a deeper understanding of CoT reasoning in LLMs. It also emphasizes the importance of considering data distributions when evaluating model performance and reliability. As AI continues to advance, it is crucial to address these limitations to ensure that LLMs are used responsibly and effectively in various domains.