Mitigating state transition errors during readout with a synchronized flux pulse

AI-generated keywords: Quantum tasks State transitions Qubit measurements Quantum error correction Fluxonium qubits

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study focused on detrimental effects of state transitions during qubit measurements on quantum tasks
  • Transitions can occur due to excessive measurement power or inadvertent coupling to lossy modes like TLSs
  • Experimental verification of TLS impact in qubit readout through measuring transition errors at different qubit flux biases
  • State transitions are often localized in frequency space
  • Researchers demonstrated ability to avoid state transitions during fluxonium readout by leveraging qubit's flux-tunability
  • Achieved optimal readout fidelity of 99% (98.4%) in integration times of 1 us (0.5 us)
  • Work advances understanding of state transitions in superconducting circuit measurements and highlights potential of fluxonium qubits for fast and high-fidelity readout
  • Findings offer insights for improving quantum tasks requiring repeated measurements and enhancing quantum error correction protocols
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yulong Li, Wuerkaixi Nuerbolati, Chunqing Deng, Xizheng Ma, Haonan Xiong, Haifeng Yu

arXiv: 2507.14436v1 - DOI (quant-ph)
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: State transitions during qubit measurements are extremely detrimental to quantum tasks that rely on repeated measurements, such as quantum error correction. These state transitions can occur when excessive measurement power leads to qubit excitations outside its computational space. Alternatively, the qubit state can decay rapidly when the measurement protocol inadvertently couples the qubit to lossy modes such as two-level systems (TLSs). We experimentally verify the impact of these TLSs in qubit readout by measuring the transition errors at different qubit flux bias. Because such state transitions during measurements are often localized in frequency space, we demonstrate the ability to avoid them during a fluxonium readout by exploiting the qubit's flux-tunability. By synchronizing the flux bias with the readout photon dynamics, we obtain an optimal readout fidelity of 99 % (98.4 %) in 1 us (0.5 us) integration time. Our work advances the understanding of state transitions in superconducting circuit measurements and demonstrates the potential of fluxonium qubits to achieve fast high-fidelity readout.

Submitted to arXiv on 19 Jul. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2507.14436v1

A recent study investigated the detrimental effects of state transitions during qubit measurements on quantum tasks that rely on repeated measurements, such as quantum error correction. These transitions can occur due to excessive measurement power leading to qubit excitations outside its computational space or inadvertent coupling to lossy modes like two-level systems (TLSs). Experimental verification of TLS impact in qubit readout was done by measuring transition errors at different qubit flux biases. The study highlighted that these state transitions are often localized in frequency space. To address this issue, researchers demonstrated the ability to avoid them during a fluxonium readout by leveraging the qubit's flux-tunability. By synchronizing the flux bias with the readout photon dynamics, they achieved an optimal readout fidelity of 99% (98.4%) in integration times of 1 us (0.5 us). This work not only advances our understanding of state transitions in superconducting circuit measurements but also showcases the potential of fluxonium qubits for achieving fast and high-fidelity readout. The findings provide valuable insights for improving quantum tasks that require repeated measurements and offer a promising avenue for enhancing quantum error correction protocols.
Created on 17 Feb. 2026

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.