Towards Improved Research Methodologies for Industrial AI: A case study of false call reduction

AI-generated keywords: Artificial Intelligence Research Methodologies Success Criteria Model Performance Business Objectives

AI-generated Key Points

  • The study evaluates the readiness of current AI research methodologies for creating successful and profitable AI applications.
  • Researchers identify seven common weaknesses in related peer-reviewed work and demonstrate their consequences experimentally.
  • Stability in ML application results is crucial, requiring multiple runs with different random seeds for consistent performance.
  • Setting clear success criteria and defining requirement-aware metrics directly reflecting business impact are emphasized for effective business objectives.
  • Analyzing model performance over time, especially in real-world scenarios, is highlighted as important.
  • The methodology involves a best practice modeling phase and analysis of model performance over time to simulate deployment scenarios.
  • Comparing regular metrics like accuracy, F1-score, and AUC with requirement-aware metrics tailored to business objectives showcases how inappropriate metrics can mislead in assessing model effectiveness.
  • Challenges such as setting decision thresholds and monitoring model performance decay over time are discussed.
  • Potential improvements suggested include incorporating performance metrics into neural network loss functions and exploring smarter sampling methods for monitoring long-term model deployment success.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Korbinian Pfab, Marcel Rothering

Submitted and accepted to IEEE COMPSAC 2025
License: CC BY-SA 4.0

Abstract: Are current artificial intelligence (AI) research methodologies ready to create successful, productive, and profitable AI applications? This work presents a case study on an industrial AI use case called false call reduction for automated optical inspection to demonstrate the shortcomings of current best practices. We identify seven weaknesses prevalent in related peer-reviewed work and experimentally show their consequences. We show that the best-practice methodology would fail for this use case. We argue amongst others for the necessity of requirement-aware metrics to ensure achieving business objectives, clear definitions of success criteria, and a thorough analysis of temporal dynamics in experimental datasets. Our work encourages researchers to critically assess their methodologies for more successful applied AI research.

Submitted to arXiv on 17 Jun. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2506.14521v1

The study evaluates the readiness of current artificial intelligence (AI) research methodologies in creating successful and profitable AI applications. It uses a case study on false call reduction for automated optical inspection (AOI) as an industrial AI use case. The researchers identify seven weaknesses commonly found in related peer-reviewed work and experimentally demonstrate their consequences. One key aspect highlighted is the importance of stability in ML application results, emphasizing the need for multiple runs with different random seeds to ensure consistent performance. The researchers stress the significance of setting clear success criteria and defining requirement-aware metrics that directly reflect business impact for achieving effective business objectives. They also emphasize the importance of analyzing model performance over time, especially when deploying models in real-world scenarios. The methodology employed involves a best practice modeling phase and an analysis of model performance over time to simulate deployment scenarios. By comparing regular metrics like accuracy, F1-score, and AUC with requirement-aware metrics tailored to business objectives, the researchers showcase how inappropriate metrics can mislead in assessing model effectiveness. Furthermore, the study delves into challenges such as setting decision thresholds and monitoring model performance decay over time. The researchers suggest potential improvements, including incorporating performance metrics into neural network loss functions and exploring smarter sampling methods for monitoring long-term model deployment success. Overall, this study's findings are valuable for researchers working on false call reduction for AOI use cases by providing access to source code and data. Additionally, it offers insights for researchers aiming to enhance research methodologies for applied AI across various industries beyond electronic production. By addressing common weaknesses prevalent in AI research practices, this work encourages critical assessment and refinement of methodologies to ensure more successful outcomes in applied AI research endeavors.
Created on 03 Aug. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.