Reflect, Retry, Reward: Self-Improving LLMs via Reinforcement Learning
AI-generated Key Points
- Novel approach to improving performance of large language models (LLMs) through self-reflection and reinforcement learning mechanisms
- Methodology involves prompting model to generate self-reflective commentaries upon failing a task, analyzing previous attempt, and making a second attempt with insights gained
- Use of reinforcement learning techniques to reward tokens generated during self-reflection phase for more effective reflections in future attempts
- Enables LLMs to improve performance on diverse tasks without requiring task-specific training data
- Experimental evaluations show significant performance gains across various model architectures, with smaller fine-tuned models outperforming larger models in some cases
- Framework leverages self-reflection and reinforcement learning in a task-agnostic manner with binary feedback signals for developing more reliable and adaptable language models that can autonomously improve on challenging tasks
Authors: Shelly Bensal, Umar Jamil, Christopher Bryant, Melisa Russak, Kiran Kamble, Dmytro Mozolevskyi, Muayad Ali, Waseem AlShikh
Abstract: We explore a method for improving the performance of large language models through self-reflection and reinforcement learning. By incentivizing the model to generate better self-reflections when it answers incorrectly, we demonstrate that a model's ability to solve complex, verifiable tasks can be enhanced even when generating synthetic data is infeasible and only binary feedback is available. Our framework operates in two stages: first, upon failing a given task, the model generates a self-reflective commentary analyzing its previous attempt; second, the model is given another attempt at the task with the self-reflection in context. If the subsequent attempt succeeds, the tokens generated during the self-reflection phase are rewarded. Our experimental results show substantial performance gains across a variety of model architectures, as high as 34.7% improvement at math equation writing and 18.1% improvement at function calling. Notably, smaller fine-tuned models (1.5 billion to 7 billion parameters) outperform models in the same family that are 10 times larger. Our novel paradigm is thus an exciting pathway to more useful and reliable language models that can self-improve on challenging tasks with limited external feedback.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.