Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2505.15957v1

In recent years, the field of large audio-language models (LALMs) has seen significant advancements. These LALMs have expanded the capabilities of traditional large language models (LLMs) by incorporating auditory processing. They are designed to excel in a wide range of auditory tasks and have shown promise in various domains such as speech recognition, audio generation, and multimodal reasoning. Despite the emergence of benchmarks to evaluate LALM performance, there is a lack of a structured taxonomy to categorize and assess these models comprehensively. To address this gap, a comprehensive survey was conducted to propose a systematic taxonomy for evaluating LALMs across four key dimensions: General Auditory Awareness and Processing, Knowledge and Reasoning, Dialogue-oriented Ability, and Fairness, Safety, and Trustworthiness. Each dimension provides detailed insights into the specific objectives and challenges associated with evaluating LALMs in those areas. This survey represents the first focused effort on systematically evaluating LALMs and aims to provide clear guidelines for researchers and practitioners in the field. By categorizing evaluations based on their objectives, this taxonomy offers a holistic view of LALM capabilities and highlights areas for improvement and future research directions. The surveyed papers will be made available to support ongoing advancements in the field, ensuring that LALMs continue to evolve towards universal proficiency across auditory tasks.

• - Large audio-language models (LALMs) have advanced traditional large language models (LLMs) by incorporating auditory processing.
• - LALMs excel in auditory tasks such as speech recognition, audio generation, and multimodal reasoning.
• - A comprehensive survey proposed a taxonomy for evaluating LALMs across four dimensions: General Auditory Awareness and Processing, Knowledge and Reasoning, Dialogue-oriented Ability, and Fairness, Safety, and Trustworthiness.
• - The taxonomy aims to provide clear guidelines for researchers and practitioners in the field to evaluate LALMs systematically.
• - Categorizing evaluations based on objectives offers a holistic view of LALM capabilities and identifies areas for improvement and future research directions.

Summary- Big talking-computer models (LALMs) are better than big writing-computer models (LLMs) because they can understand sounds. - LALMs are great at tasks like understanding speech, making sounds, and thinking in different ways. - A detailed study made a plan to check how good LALMs are in four areas: Understanding Sounds, Thinking and Learning, Talking with People, and Being Fair and Safe. - The plan helps scientists and experts know how to test LALMs properly. - Sorting tests by goals shows all the things LALMs can do well and helps find ways to make them even better. Definitions- Auditory: Related to hearing or sounds. - Processing: Dealing with information or data in a certain way. - Taxonomy: A system for organizing things into groups based on similarities. - Dialogue-oriented: Focused on having conversations with people. - Trustworthiness: Being reliable and deserving of trust.

Large audio-language models (LALMs) have been gaining significant attention and advancements in recent years. These models, which incorporate auditory processing into traditional large language models (LLMs), have shown great potential in various domains such as speech recognition, audio generation, and multimodal reasoning. However, despite the emergence of benchmarks to evaluate LALM performance, there is a lack of a structured taxonomy to comprehensively categorize and assess these models. To address this gap, a comprehensive survey was conducted to propose a systematic taxonomy for evaluating LALMs across four key dimensions: General Auditory Awareness and Processing, Knowledge and Reasoning, Dialogue-oriented Ability, and Fairness, Safety, and Trustworthiness. Each dimension provides detailed insights into the specific objectives and challenges associated with evaluating LALMs in those areas. The first dimension of General Auditory Awareness and Processing focuses on the ability of LALMs to process auditory information accurately. This includes tasks such as speech recognition and audio classification. The second dimension of Knowledge and Reasoning evaluates the model's ability to understand complex auditory inputs and reason about them effectively. This involves tasks like natural language understanding (NLU) and knowledge representation. The third dimension of Dialogue-oriented Ability examines how well LALMs can engage in dialogue with humans or other agents through spoken or written language. This includes tasks like conversational AI systems or chatbots that require both linguistic understanding as well as auditory processing capabilities. Lastly, the Fairness, Safety, and Trustworthiness dimension addresses ethical concerns surrounding LALM development. As these models become more advanced in their abilities to process human-like conversations through audio inputs, it is crucial to ensure they are fair towards all individuals regardless of race or gender identity. Additionally, safety measures must be put in place to prevent malicious use of these models while maintaining trustworthiness among users. By categorizing evaluations based on their objectives rather than specific tasks or datasets used, this taxonomy offers a holistic view of LALM capabilities. It also highlights areas for improvement and future research directions in each dimension. This approach allows researchers and practitioners to have a better understanding of the strengths and limitations of LALMs, leading to more targeted efforts towards improving these models. Moreover, this survey represents the first focused effort on systematically evaluating LALMs. The surveyed papers will be made available to support ongoing advancements in the field, ensuring that LALMs continue to evolve towards universal proficiency across auditory tasks. This not only benefits researchers but also has practical implications for industries such as speech recognition technology or virtual assistants that heavily rely on audio-language processing. In conclusion, the proposed taxonomy provides a comprehensive framework for evaluating LALMs and addresses key dimensions necessary for their success in various domains. By providing clear guidelines and insights into the specific objectives and challenges associated with each dimension, this taxonomy aims to drive further advancements in the field of large audio-language models. With continued research and development guided by this taxonomy, we can expect even greater capabilities from LALMs in the future.