Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2505.14302v1

, , , , Large language models (LLMs) present challenges in terms of computational and memory resources, making deployment difficult. Quantization-aware training (QAT) has emerged as a solution to these challenges by reducing model precision while maintaining performance. However, the scaling behavior of QAT, particularly at 4-bit precision (W4A4), lacks a comprehensive understanding. Existing scaling laws for QAT often overlook crucial factors such as the number of training tokens and quantization granularity, limiting their practicality. To address this gap, this paper introduces a unified scaling law for QAT that considers quantization error as a function of model size, training data volume, and quantization group size. Through 268 experiments on QAT, the study reveals that quantization error decreases with increasing model size but increases with more training tokens and coarser quantization granularity. The analysis further decomposes W4A4 quantization error into weight and activation components, both following the overall trend but exhibiting different sensitivities. Specifically, weight quantization error escalates more rapidly with an increase in training tokens. The research identifies activation quantization error in the FC2 layer as the primary bottleneck of W4A4 QAT quantization error due to outliers. By implementing mixed-precision quantization to address this bottleneck, the study demonstrates that weight and activation quantization errors can converge to similar levels. Moreover, with additional training data, weight quantization error eventually surpasses activation quantization error, emphasizing the importance of reducing weight quantization error in such scenarios.

• - Large language models (LLMs) pose challenges in terms of computational and memory resources for deployment
• - Quantization-aware training (QAT) reduces model precision while maintaining performance
• - Existing scaling laws for QAT, particularly at 4-bit precision (W4A4), lack a comprehensive understanding
• - A unified scaling law for QAT is introduced in the paper, considering quantization error as a function of model size, training data volume, and quantization group size

Summary1. Big talking computers can be hard to use because they need a lot of computer power and memory. 2. Training models in a special way can make them work well even with less precision. 3. People don't fully understand how well this works for models with very low precision. 4. A new rule is suggested in the paper that looks at mistakes made during this special training based on model size, data used for training, and group size. 5. This new rule helps make sure the models work better even when they are not very precise. Definitions- Large language models (LLMs): Big computers that understand and generate human language. - Computational resources: The power needed to do calculations on a computer. - Memory resources: Space needed to store information on a computer. - Quantization-aware training (QAT): Special way of training models that reduces their precision while keeping performance good. - Scaling laws: Rules or patterns that explain how things change as they get bigger or smaller. - 4-bit precision (W4A4): Refers to using only 4 bits to represent numbers in a model, which means less accuracy but faster processing. - Unified scaling law: A single rule that considers multiple factors together for better understanding and application.

Introduction: Large language models (LLMs) have shown great potential in various natural language processing tasks, such as machine translation, text summarization, and question-answering. However, the deployment of these models presents challenges due to their high computational and memory requirements. To address this issue, quantization-aware training (QAT) has emerged as a solution by reducing model precision while maintaining performance. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the scaling behavior of QAT at 4-bit precision (W4A4). Background: Quantization is the process of reducing the number of bits used to represent numerical values in a model. In QAT, this is done during the training phase by simulating low-precision arithmetic operations on full-precision parameters. This allows for faster inference times and lower memory usage without significant loss in performance. Previous research has focused on developing scaling laws for QAT that consider factors such as model size and quantization granularity. However, these studies often overlook crucial factors like the number of training tokens, which can significantly impact quantization error. Unified Scaling Law for W4A4 Quantization Error: This paper introduces a unified scaling law for W4A4 QAT that considers quantization error as a function of three key factors: model size, training data volume, and quantization group size. The study conducted 268 experiments on QAT using different combinations of these factors to analyze their impact on quantization error. Impact of Model Size: The results show that with an increase in model size, there is a decrease in overall quantization error. This can be attributed to larger models having more parameters that can better handle noise introduced by low-precision arithmetic operations. Impact of Training Data Volume: Interestingly, it was found that an increase in training data volume leads to higher overall quantization error. This is because more data means more outliers or extreme values in the distribution of weights and activations, which can be challenging to quantize accurately. Impact of Quantization Granularity: The study also found that coarser quantization granularity leads to higher overall quantization error. This is because a larger range of values is mapped to the same quantized value, resulting in more information loss. Decomposition of W4A4 Quantization Error: To gain a better understanding of the sources of W4A4 quantization error, the paper decomposes it into weight and activation components. The results show that both components follow the overall trend but exhibit different sensitivities to the three key factors. Weight vs. Activation Quantization Error: The analysis revealed that weight quantization error escalates more rapidly with an increase in training tokens compared to activation quantization error. This highlights the importance of reducing weight quantization error in scenarios with large amounts of training data. Activation Quantization Error in FC2 Layer: Further investigation showed that activation quantization error in the FC2 layer (the last fully connected layer) was the primary bottleneck for W4A4 QAT due to outliers. These outliers are extreme values that are difficult to represent accurately with low-precision numbers. Mixed-Precision Quantization: To address this bottleneck, mixed-precision quantization was implemented, where different layers were assigned different precision levels based on their sensitivity to noise. The results showed that this approach could significantly reduce activation quantization error and bring it closer to weight quantization error levels. Conclusion: In conclusion, this paper provides a comprehensive understanding of the scaling behavior of QAT at 4-bit precision by considering key factors such as model size, training data volume, and quantization granularity. It also highlights the importance of reducing weight and activation quantizati