Understanding Gen Alpha Digital Language: Evaluation of LLM Safety Systems for Content Moderation

AI-generated keywords: Artificial Intelligence Generation Alpha Digital Language Online Safety Linguistic Divergence

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Research by Manisha Mehta and Fausto Giunchiglia evaluates how AI systems interpret Gen Alpha's digital language
  • Gen Alpha faces unique online risks due to immersive digital engagement and evolving communication styles
  • Study assesses AI models' ability to detect disguised harassment and manipulation within Gen Alpha discourse
  • Analysis uncovers critical comprehension failures in existing safety tools for Gen Alpha expressions
  • Key contributions include creation of a novel dataset, development of framework for enhancing AI moderation systems, multi-perspective evaluation involving AI systems, human moderators, parents, and input from Gen Alpha co-researchers
  • Findings highlight the need to redesign safety systems attuned to youth communication patterns to address vulnerability in online spaces
  • Study addresses critical challenges related to digital safety in the context of Generation Alpha's linguistic landscape
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Manisha Mehta, Fausto Giunchiglia

Accepted to ACM FAccT 2025. To be presented in Athens, June 2025, and published in the conference proceedings. Preprint version; final version will appear in the ACM Digital Library
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Abstract: This research offers a unique evaluation of how AI systems interpret the digital language of Generation Alpha (Gen Alpha, born 2010-2024). As the first cohort raised alongside AI, Gen Alpha faces new forms of online risk due to immersive digital engagement and a growing mismatch between their evolving communication and existing safety tools. Their distinct language, shaped by gaming, memes, and AI-driven trends, often conceals harmful interactions from both human moderators and automated systems. We assess four leading AI models (GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, and Llama 3) on their ability to detect masked harassment and manipulation within Gen Alpha discourse. Using a dataset of 100 recent expressions from gaming platforms, social media, and video content, the study reveals critical comprehension failures with direct implications for online safety. This work contributes: (1) a first-of-its-kind dataset capturing Gen Alpha expressions; (2) a framework to improve AI moderation systems for youth protection; (3) a multi-perspective evaluation including AI systems, human moderators, and parents, with direct input from Gen Alpha co-researchers; and (4) an analysis of how linguistic divergence increases youth vulnerability. Findings highlight the urgent need to redesign safety systems attuned to youth communication, especially given Gen Alpha reluctance to seek help when adults fail to understand their digital world. This study combines the insight of a Gen Alpha researcher with systematic academic analysis to address critical digital safety challenges.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 May. 2025

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2505.10588v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

This research by Manisha Mehta and Fausto Giunchiglia provides a comprehensive evaluation of how artificial intelligence (AI) systems interpret the digital language of Generation Alpha (Gen Alpha), individuals born between 2010 and 2024. As the first cohort raised alongside AI technology, Gen Alpha faces unique online risks due to their immersive digital engagement and evolving communication styles. These may not align with existing safety tools. The study focuses on assessing four prominent AI models - GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, and Llama 3 - in their ability to detect disguised harassment and manipulation within Gen Alpha discourse. The distinct language of Gen Alpha, influenced by gaming, memes, and AI-driven trends, often masks harmful interactions from both human moderators and automated systems. By analyzing a dataset comprising 100 recent expressions from various online platforms such as gaming platforms, social media channels, and video content, the research uncovers critical comprehension failures that have direct implications for online safety measures. Key contributions of this work include the creation of a novel dataset capturing Gen Alpha expressions; the development of a framework aimed at enhancing AI moderation systems for youth protection; a multi-perspective evaluation involving AI systems, human moderators, parents; input from Gen Alpha co-researchers; and an analysis of how linguistic divergence among Gen Alpha individuals increases their vulnerability in online spaces. The findings underscore the pressing need to redesign safety systems that are attuned to youth communication patterns. This is especially crucial given Gen Alpha's reluctance to seek help when adults fail to grasp their digital world. By combining insights from a Gen Alpha researcher with systematic academic analysis, this study addresses critical challenges related to digital safety in the context of Generation Alpha's unique linguistic landscape. The research has been accepted for presentation at ACM FAccT 2025 in Athens and will be published in the conference proceedings before appearing in the ACM Digital Library.
Created on 13 Aug. 2025

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.